Connect with us

Opinion & Analysis

Singh’s case against the Tour will be hard to win

Published

on

On Wednesday, Vijay Singh filed suit against the PGA Tour over his use of deer antler spray claiming he was subjected to “public humiliation and ridicule for months.” In a press release his lawyer stated:

“Singh seeks damages for the PGA Tour’s reckless administration and implementation of its Anti-Doping Program. After exposing Singh, one of the PGA Tour’s most respected and hardest working golfers, to public humiliation and ridicule for months, and forcing Singh to perform the type of scientific analyses and review that the PGA Tour was responsible for performing, the PGA Tour finally admitted that the grounds on which it sought to impose discipline were specious and unsupportable.”

Singh claims he compared the ingredients in the deer antler spray along with the Anti-Doping Program’s banned substance list and the spray did not contain any banned substances. In addition, Singh claims to have submitted to a urine test which came back negative for banned substances.

In the lawsuit, Singh claims the PGA Tour tried to suspend him for 90 days, and only dropped its case after WADA removed the substance in deer antler spray off its banned list.

So the million dollar question is: Does Singh have a case?

Defamation or public humiliation is a very difficult case for a public figure to win. A public figure has less privacy than you or I do. Also, Singh brought this upon himself. He came out in public and announced he took the substance, subjecting himself to the humiliation of taking a “banned” substance, regardless of whether the substance should have been banned or not. If he never came out and said he took the spray, he never would have been subject to suspension and never would have been subject to public humiliation.

In addition, the Tour will likely argue, it follows WADA and WADA determines whether a substance is banned or not. Not to mention, the Tour has a strong argument — it keeps its suspensions private. In fact, it has long been a knock that players mysteriously take a tournament off for no apparent reason after committing an offense the week prior. See Sabbatini, Rory.

The PGA Tour will argue Singh’s suspension would have been kept quiet like every other suspension if it chose to suspend him. The fact that the Tour did not suspend him and dropped the case is further evidence in the Tour’s favor.

In all likelihood, Singh is going to have a pretty difficult time proving what the PGA Tour did alone subject him to public humiliation when he publicly humiliated himself by admitting to taking the substance.

Your Reaction?
  • 0
  • LEGIT0
  • WOW0
  • LOL0
  • IDHT0
  • FLOP0
  • OB0
  • SHANK1

Seth is an avid golfer playing year round in Florida.

14 Comments

14 Comments

  1. Jim

    May 16, 2013 at 6:54 am

    VJ is right but wrong to waste time, money and his reputation with the suit.

    However, his next lawsuit, his ‘probable’ suit over the banning of the long putter will be the one to watch. He will instigate a ‘class action’ suit against the PGA against the banning.

  2. blopar

    May 14, 2013 at 12:19 pm

    Vijay’s biggest problem is that he is Vijay. Have you ever heard the expression never look for trouble, let trouble come to you? Well Vijay is just the opposite….he always looks for trouble and makes it public! The tour should have kicked his a*s right at the start of this. What a nice guy–they let him off an obvious hook—-and he sues them. Total Jerk!

  3. David Sefton

    May 10, 2013 at 12:34 pm

    …and Finchem saw fit to support his players, including Singh, over the anchored putter rule!

  4. RH

    May 10, 2013 at 8:42 am

    Botttom line is he took something that was on the banned list at the time and admitted it. He should’ve been suspended right then and there, it doesn’t matter that WADA removed it from the list after the fact, it was on the list at the time. If it was a nobody on tour he would’ve been suspended,Vijay should just shut his mouth and go to the Senior tour

  5. yo!

    May 9, 2013 at 8:32 pm

    This is a guy that was banned from the Asian tour in the past for supposedly cheating.

  6. Geoff

    May 9, 2013 at 1:41 pm

    The biggest reason Singh’s case will fail is not discussed above. Every PGA tour player, per their participation contract, waives the right to sue the Tour on account of drug policy violations. His case won’t survive a motion to dismiss on this ground alone.

    • Devon

      May 9, 2013 at 2:26 pm

      The thing is, he didn’t violate a drug policy. The PGA violated a rule and that I believe is grounds action. Now, whether it actually makes it into courts or if they come to an agreement is a different story but I believe Singh is in the right with this one regardless of his intentions, unfortunately.

      • Geoff

        May 9, 2013 at 2:30 pm

        I should have been a touch clearer. I believe the PGA tour waiver is broader and prevents players for suing the Tour for anything related to drug testing, for example false positives and the like. I don’t doubt Singh’s lawyers have considered this and researched it, though. I do also agree that Singh is in the right, the Tour screwed the pooch.

  7. M Bartolomeo

    May 9, 2013 at 1:07 pm

    Such a typical Singh response. As much as I respect him as a player, he is always making the wrong comments and the wrong decisions. All there is left to do is shake your head, and file this one away as another Singh-fu (that would be a Singh snafu).

  8. Steve

    May 8, 2013 at 7:49 pm

    If Singh didn’t think the deer antler spray provided an advantage, why did he spend so much money to buy it? So now his defense is that he only *intended* to use a performance enhancing substance? And because he wasn’t smart enough to actually cheat, he thinks the PGA defamed him? Wow.

    • Trevor

      May 9, 2013 at 11:17 am

      You’ve completely missed the point. It’s already been deemed non-performance enhancing but the PGA tour didn’t think to have the spray tested BEFORE calling him out as a cheater, they didn’t do ANY research into the spray whatsoever. They basically publicly humiliated and accused him of cheating without evidence.

      • Corey

        May 9, 2013 at 7:36 pm

        the fact that they didnt shouldnt even matter. he took something that he knew was on the ban list, regardless of whether it should have been. he should have petitioned for its removal, then once it was removed start taking it. also, you most likely wont win a defamation case over statements you admit to making. truth is an affirmative defense in a defamation case. hey vijay did you make the statements? vijay:”ya.” case dismissed

        • Corey

          May 9, 2013 at 9:54 pm

          Also, without getting too much into the legal elements, a public figure plaintiff has to prove falsity.

  9. Mat

    May 8, 2013 at 4:09 pm

    It’s not always about winning. Golfers don’t have a union; they’re ICs.

Leave a Reply

Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

19th Hole

Vincenzi’s 2024 Zurich Classic of New Orleans betting preview

Published

on

The PGA TOUR heads to New Orleans to play the 2023 Zurich Classic of New Orleans. In a welcome change from the usual stroke play, the Zurich Classic is a team event. On Thursday and Saturday, the teams play best ball, and on Friday and Sunday the teams play alternate shot.

TPC Louisiana is a par 72 that measures 7,425 yards. The course features some short par 4s and plenty of water and bunkers, which makes for a lot of exciting risk/reward scenarios for competitors. Pete Dye designed the course in 2004 specifically for the Zurich Classic, although the event didn’t make its debut until 2007 because of Hurricane Katrina.

Coming off of the Masters and a signature event in consecutive weeks, the field this week is a step down, and understandably so. Many of the world’s top players will be using this time to rest after a busy stretch.

However, there are some interesting teams this season with some stars making surprise appearances in the team event. Some notable teams include Patrick Cantlay and Xander Schauffele, Rory McIlroy and Shane Lowry, Collin Morikawa and Kurt Kitayama, Will Zalatoris and Sahith Theegala as well as a few Canadian teams, Nick Taylor and Adam Hadwin and Taylor Pendrith and Corey Conners.

Past Winners at TPC Louisiana

  • 2023: Riley/Hardy (-30)
  • 2022: Cantlay/Schauffele (-29)
  • 2021: Leishman/Smith (-20)
  • 2019: Palmer/Rahm (-26)
  • 2018: Horschel/Piercy (-22)
  • 2017: Blixt/Smith (-27)

2024 Zurich Classic of New Orleans Picks

Tom Hoge/Maverick McNealy +2500 (DraftKings)

Tom Hoge is coming off of a solid T18 finish at the RBC Heritage and finished T13 at last year’s Zurich Classic alongside Harris English.

This season, Hoge is having one of his best years on Tour in terms of Strokes Gained: Approach. In his last 24 rounds, the only player to top him on the category is Scottie Scheffler. Hoge has been solid on Pete Dye designs, ranking 28th in the field over his past 36 rounds.

McNealy is also having a solid season. He’s finished T6 at the Waste Management Phoenix Open and T9 at the PLAYERS Championship. He recently started working with world renowned swing coach, Butch Harmon, and its seemingly paid dividends in 2024.

Keith Mitchell/Joel Dahmen +4000 (DraftKings)

Keith Mitchell is having a fantastic season, finishing in the top-20 of five of his past seven starts on Tour. Most recently, Mitchell finished T14 at the Valero Texas Open and gained a whopping 6.0 strokes off the tee. He finished 6th at last year’s Zurich Classic.

Joel Dahmen is having a resurgent year and has been dialed in with his irons. He also has a T11 finish at the PLAYERS Championship at TPC Sawgrass which is another Pete Dye track. With Mitchell’s length and Dahmen’s ability to put it close with his short irons, the Mitchell/Dahmen combination will be dangerous this week.

Taylor Moore/Matt NeSmith +6500 (DraftKings)

Taylor Moore has quickly developed into one of the more consistent players on Tour. He’s finished in the top-20 in three of his past four starts, including a very impressive showing at The Masters, finishing T20. He’s also finished T4 at this event in consecutive seasons alongside Matt NeSmith.

NeSmith isn’t having a great 2024, but has seemed to elevate his game in this format. He finished T26 at Pete Dye’s TPC Sawgrass, which gives the 30-year-old something to build off of. NeSmith is also a great putter on Bermudagrass, which could help elevate Moore’s ball striking prowess.

Your Reaction?
  • 8
  • LEGIT3
  • WOW1
  • LOL1
  • IDHT0
  • FLOP3
  • OB1
  • SHANK1

Continue Reading

19th Hole

Vincenzi’s 2024 LIV Adelaide betting preview: Cam Smith ready for big week down under

Published

on

After having four of the top twelve players on the leaderboard at The Masters, LIV Golf is set for their fifth event of the season: LIV Adelaide. 

For both LIV fans and golf fans in Australia, LIV Adelaide is one of the most anticipated events of the year. With 35,000 people expected to attend each day of the tournament, the Grange Golf Club will be crawling with fans who are passionate about the sport of golf. The 12th hole, better known as “the watering hole”, is sure to have the rowdiest of the fans cheering after a long day of drinking some Leishman Lager.  

The Grange Golf Club is a par-72 that measures 6,946 yards. The course features minimal resistance, as golfers went extremely low last season. In 2023, Talor Gooch shot consecutive rounds of 62 on Thursday and Friday, giving himself a gigantic cushion heading into championship Sunday. Things got tight for a while, but in the end, the Oklahoma State product was able to hold off The Crushers’ Anirban Lahiri for a three-shot victory. 

The Four Aces won the team competition with the Range Goats finishing second. 

*All Images Courtesy of LIV Golf*

Past Winners at LIV Adelaide

  • 2023: Talor Gooch (-19)

Stat Leaders Through LIV Miami

Green in Regulation

  1. Richard Bland
  2. Jon Rahm
  3. Paul Casey

Fairways Hit

  1. Abraham Ancer
  2. Graeme McDowell
  3. Henrik Stenson

Driving Distance

  1. Bryson DeChambeau
  2. Joaquin Niemann
  3. Dean Burmester

Putting

  1. Cameron Smith
  2. Louis Oosthuizen
  3. Matt Jones

2024 LIV Adelaide Picks

Cameron Smith +1400 (DraftKings)

When I pulled up the odds for LIV Adelaide, I was more than a little surprised to see multiple golfers listed ahead of Cameron Smith on the betting board. A few starts ago, Cam finished runner-up at LIV Hong Kong, which is a golf course that absolutely suits his eye. Augusta National in another course that Smith could roll out of bed and finish in the top-ten at, and he did so two weeks ago at The Masters, finishing T6.

At Augusta, he gained strokes on the field on approach, off the tee (slightly), and of course, around the green and putting. Smith able to get in the mix at a major championship despite coming into the week feeling under the weather tells me that his game is once again rounding into form.

The Grange Golf Club is another course that undoubtedly suits the Australian. Smith is obviously incredibly comfortable playing in front of the Aussie faithful and has won three Australian PGA Championship’s. The course is very short and will allow Smith to play conservative off the tee, mitigating his most glaring weakness. With birdies available all over the golf course, there’s a chance the event turns into a putting contest, and there’s no one on the planet I’d rather have in one of those than Cam Smith.

Louis Oosthuizen +2200 (DraftKings)

Louis Oosthuizen has simply been one of the best players on LIV in the 2024 seas0n. The South African has finished in the top-10 on the LIV leaderboard in three of his five starts, with his best coming in Jeddah, where he finished T2. Perhaps more impressively, Oosthuizen finished T7 at LIV Miami, which took place at Doral’s “Blue Monster”, an absolutely massive golf course. Given that Louis is on the shorter side in terms of distance off the tee, his ability to play well in Miami shows how dialed he is with the irons this season.

In addition to the LIV finishes, Oosthuizen won back-to-back starts on the DP World Tour in December at the Alfred Dunhill Championship and the Mauritus Open. He also finished runner-up at the end of February in the International Series Oman. The 41-year-old has been one of the most consistent performers of 2024, regardless of tour.

For the season, Louis ranks 4th on LIV in birdies made, T9 in fairways hit and first in putting. He ranks 32nd in driving distance, but that won’t be an issue at this short course. Last season, he finished T11 at the event, but was in decent position going into the final round but fell back after shooting 70 while the rest of the field went low. This season, Oosthuizen comes into the event in peak form, and the course should be a perfect fit for his smooth swing and hot putter this week.

Your Reaction?
  • 12
  • LEGIT3
  • WOW1
  • LOL1
  • IDHT0
  • FLOP1
  • OB1
  • SHANK1

Continue Reading

Opinion & Analysis

The Wedge Guy: What really makes a wedge work? Part 1

Published

on

Of all the clubs in our bags, wedges are almost always the simplest in construction and, therefore, the easiest to analyze what might make one work differently from another if you know what to look for.

Wedges are a lot less mysterious than drivers, of course, as the major brands are working with a lot of “pixie dust” inside these modern marvels. That’s carrying over more to irons now, with so many new models featuring internal multi-material technologies, and almost all of them having a “badge” or insert in the back to allow more complex graphics while hiding the actual distribution of mass.

But when it comes to wedges, most on the market today are still single pieces of molded steel, either cast or forged into that shape. So, if you look closely at where the mass is distributed, it’s pretty clear how that wedge is going to perform.

To start, because of their wider soles, the majority of the mass of almost any wedge is along the bottom third of the clubhead. So, the best wedge shots are always those hit between the 2nd and 5th grooves so that more mass is directly behind that impact. Elite tour professionals practice incessantly to learn to do that consistently, wearing out a spot about the size of a penny right there. If impact moves higher than that, the face is dramatically thinner, so smash factor is compromised significantly, which reduces the overall distance the ball will fly.

Every one of us, tour players included, knows that maddening shot that we feel a bit high on the face and it doesn’t go anywhere, it’s not your fault.

If your wedges show a wear pattern the size of a silver dollar, and centered above the 3rd or 4th groove, you are not getting anywhere near the same performance from shot to shot. Robot testing proves impact even two to three grooves higher in the face can cause distance loss of up to 35 to 55 feet with modern ‘tour design’ wedges.

In addition, as impact moves above the center of mass, the golf club principle of gear effect causes the ball to fly higher with less spin. Think of modern drivers for a minute. The “holy grail” of driving is high launch and low spin, and the driver engineers are pulling out all stops to get the mass as low in the clubhead as possible to optimize this combination.

Where is all the mass in your wedges? Low. So, disregarding the higher lofts, wedges “want” to launch the ball high with low spin – exactly the opposite of what good wedge play requires penetrating ball flight with high spin.

While almost all major brand wedges have begun putting a tiny bit more thickness in the top portion of the clubhead, conventional and modern ‘tour design’ wedges perform pretty much like they always have. Elite players learn to hit those crisp, spinny penetrating wedge shots by spending lots of practice time learning to consistently make contact low in the face.

So, what about grooves and face texture?

Grooves on any club can only do so much, and no one has any material advantage here. The USGA tightly defines what we manufacturers can do with grooves and face texture, and modern manufacturing techniques allow all of us to push those limits ever closer. And we all do. End of story.

Then there’s the topic of bounce and grinds, the most complex and confusing part of the wedge formula. Many top brands offer a complex array of sole configurations, all of them admittedly specialized to a particular kind of lie or turf conditions, and/or a particular divot pattern.

But if you don’t play the same turf all the time, and make the same size divot on every swing, how would you ever figure this out?

The only way is to take any wedge you are considering and play it a few rounds, hitting all the shots you face and observing the results. There’s simply no other way.

So, hopefully this will inspire a lively conversation in our comments section, and I’ll chime in to answer any questions you might have.

And next week, I’ll dive into the rest of the wedge formula. Yes, shafts, grips and specifications are essential, too.

Your Reaction?
  • 32
  • LEGIT7
  • WOW1
  • LOL1
  • IDHT2
  • FLOP3
  • OB1
  • SHANK3

Continue Reading

WITB

Facebook

Trending