Connect with us

Opinion & Analysis

Bobby Clampett: “The 2 big problems with club fitting”

Published

on

Four million golfers are still quitting golf in the United States each year. My concern about this trend has led me to write several recent articles for GolfWRX. I’ve shared my thoughts because I believe much can be done to help golfers better understand the game, and most importantly, improve their games in ways that are not being done today.

The high frustration level of golfers is a leading cause of their giving up the game. I’ve talked about how I’ve learned this playing in over 200 pro-ams in my five years on the Champions Tour. I’ve discussed the sources of this confusion: style-based golf instruction with an over-abundance of swing tips, as well as confusing and conflicting swing theories offered on television and internet sources, etc. Another cause for concern that no one seems to talk about involves the way club fitting is typically done in our industry. While there are many examples of how improper club fitting causes issues and frustration, there are two main areas that desperately need to be addressed by fitters and even club manufacturers.

Problem 1: Clubs Designed to Correct a Slice

The first culprit is clubs that are designed to correct a slice. I’ve had several first-time students take lessons with me this season who had been recently fit for clubs from a wide range of club fitters. Some of these students had significant out-to-in swing paths through impact and all were chronic faders/slicers of the golf ball. The clubs recommended to them were “anti-slice” clubs. All the grips were small (standard size), and the woods (especially the drivers) were upright with the sliding weights put in the heel. The irons were “jacked-upright” as much as 8 degrees. All of these adjustments were made for the purpose of building in the ability to hit hooks.

Many of the woods with today’s improvement in technology can be easily altered with sliding or interchangeable weights. Adding weights into the heel slows the heel down through impact and allows the toe to close faster. Thinner grips also encourage the golfer to have more active hands and forearms causing the toe to close faster. While some of today’s adjustable woods do allow for a small bit of upright lie adjustment, it would be good if manufacturers went back to longer hosels that can be more lie-adjusted.

If the lie of the club is upright, more “hook” is built into the club through the principle that “loft is hook.” Additionally, the more the available “loft” of the club, the more the upright angle increases hook. So a set of clubs built 8 degrees upright has a very different directional profile with the 4-iron than with the wedge. This is a fact a well trained and experienced club fitter will take into consideration and properly apply.

Without correction, a wedge that is 8 degrees upright will really go left, while the 4-iron won’t have as much correction. Additionally, the uprightness of the club significantly reduces the sweet-spot, making the club less forgiving by increasing the chance that the ball will be struck lower in the face (which has a worse effect on long irons than short irons). Gear effect has now been proven to exist even in irons, and low-in-the-clubface hits will cause a gear effect fade, magnified with lower lofted clubs, even if the face and path are square. So, the uprightness of the club creates a bigger pull/hook in the wedge and the effect doesn’t really work in the longer irons. If fitters are going to use this approach, then short irons should be bent less upright and long irons more upright, but even so, this will reduce the sweet-spot in the longer irons and most golfers will really struggle to get the ball into the air since most of their hits will be low on the clubface.

I’ve had playing lessons with some of these students and have clearly seen how much farther to the left shots go when teeing the ball up, such as on a par-3. With the contact higher in the face, the contact has “zero” gear effect. The upright lie angle, combined with the loft of the club, sends the ball with a pull-hook way off target. This alone is enough of a source of confusion and frustration to send some golfers home, back to the tennis courts, to the card room, or whatever else might take the place of golf.

Additionally, golf clubs that are set to “lie angles” that are not square will not cut through the grass (when taking divots) as they are intended to do. For example, using the example above, if the lie angle of the club is set too upright and the shot is hit a little fat, the heel of the iron will dig or hit into the grass first, usually causing the heel to slow down while the toe of the club speeds up, thus closing the face and causing a big pull/hook. Different grass types, different firmness of grasses and different density of grasses can have differing effects, leading to increased inconsistencies of golfers and greater frustration levels.

Some club manufacturers have built game-improvement irons with bigger sweet-spots (with lower CG’s and higher MOI’s). When club fitters make the lie angle “off-square,” this improvement immediately is canceled and, in most cases, completely nullifying any benefit the game-improvement design can provide. The poor golfer who just spent thousands of dollars getting new equipment comes to the realization that the clubs didn’t work that well after all, and his/her 16 handicap is not dropping.

The real answer to game improvement lies in improving the golfer’s impact first, then getting clubs to match his or ideal impact or the impact they are striving to attain. Then, and only then, will the golfer get the full and just reward for improving one’s impact. Simply trying to buy a new game by getting a new set of clubs just doesn’t work. One must work with an instructor who truly knows what proper impact is and is diligently directing the instruction to improve their impact first. Then they can have a knowledgeable club fitter fit clubs to that proper impact. Unfortunately, in our industry, instructors and club fitters rarely work together. Golfers are continually being fitted to their improper impact and thus effectively playing with clubs with smaller sweet spots that are ill-designed for what they were originally intended to do.

Problem 2: Fitting Irons for Distance

The second problem that seems to be growing in the industry is the focus on increased distance with the irons. I don’t mean to be too blunt here, but who cares how far you hit an 8-iron! Today’s pitching wedge is yesterday’s 9-iron. My pitching wedge is set at 49 degrees, and my 9-iron is 44 degrees (about the standard loft for today’s pitching wedge). The only two clubs in the bag that should be designed for distance are your driver and your 3-wood. All the other clubs should be set for proper gapping and designed to improve consistency and proximity to the hole. That’s why my pitching wedge is at 49 degrees and I only hit it 120 yards (exactly 16 yards farther than my 54-degree sand wedge). Most of my students hit a pitching wedge 20 yards farther than I do, but I drive the ball 30-40 yards farther than they do. When they get into the 7-irons through 4-irons, their gaps narrow. They have a 175-yard shot, and they don’t know what club selection to make since the 7, 6, 5, and 4 irons all go somewhat similar distances.

When I dig a little deeper, I start to find significant differences in spin rates. Like most pros on the PGA Tour, my 7 iron spins about 7000 rpm, I launch it around 17.5 degrees and carry the ball about 158 yards with 88 mph of clubhead speed. OK, I’m retired from playing competitive golf and I’m 58 years old, so I don’t have that youthful club head speed anymore. When I try some of the new products that are the top sellers today, I start launching the ball slightly higher but my spin rate drops below 6,000 rpm. Suddenly, I’m hitting my 7-iron 170 yards like my 6 iron. But is this better?

Yes, my peak height gets slightly higher (I do like that), and the ball won’t roll out much differently, even with the lower spin rates. So, what’s the problem you ask? When I start to look at distance control numbers and proximity to the hole, I clearly see higher distance dispersions and thus proximity to the hole gets worse. Learning to hit the ball flag high is one of the key separators between top PGA Tour Players and those a notch or two below. It’s also a key element in lowering scores. So, greater distance with my irons actually makes my game worse and it does the same with my students, too, because accuracy and ability to get the ball consistently closer to the hole is negatively impacted.

What avid golfers are really wanting is game improvement. They want to see their handicaps go down, shoot their lowest scores, create personal bests. Sure, there is a bit of “wow factor” they like to have with the new, shiny equipment, but the people I give lessons to and have played with in all these pro-ams want a better game! How are they going to get that when the golf industry separates teachers and club fitters? Where can golfers go to get the whole experience of tying in their swing improvement that creates better impact with their equipment properly set up?

If you want to see your scores get better, the best way to do so is to work with a qualified golf instructor who knows how to improve your impact while keeping your style of swing. You want to work with a club fitter who understands that the lie angles of the irons should be set to square, and that proximity to the hole is more important in the irons than distance. Only then can you get the biggest game improvement and take full advantage of hitting better shots with a better impact.

Improve your impact, improve your game; it really is that simple!

Your Reaction?
  • 1233
  • LEGIT139
  • WOW29
  • LOL14
  • IDHT10
  • FLOP16
  • OB15
  • SHANK94

For students wanting to experience how improving their impact will improve their games, Bobby suggests coming to his next Signature Golf School, creating your own private school for your own group, and/or signing up for a private lesson. Simply go to: www.impactzonegolf.com or call 239-236-5536. For those instructors who want to learn "Impact-Based®" instruction, Bobby Clampett now has a fully developed Advanced Level One online training fully supported by the PGA and LPGA with continuing education credits. For those who complete, Bobby and Impact Zone Golf are developing a Certification Program and ultimately a masters Program. Impact Zone Golf is ready to build an army of good golf instructors and rid the epidemic of frustrated golfers victimized by "style-based" instruction methods. Bobby Clampett is a well-known PGA Tour Winner and Longtime CBS Golf Broadcaster, but perhaps he will be best known for his discovery of Impact-Based® Instruction. His two golf academies are in Naples, Florida: Indoor Performance Studio (1040 Collier Center Way, Unit 14, Naples, FL 34110) and at the Tiburon Golf Club at the Ritz-Carlton Golf Resort. Bobby is the first golf instructor in history to be a PGA Tour winner and earn PGA Master Professional in Teaching and Coaching. He and his team of Impact-Based® Academy Trained instructors offer year-round Golf Schools, Private Lessons, Women’s Programs, Annual and Seasonal Coaching Programs, Competitive Junior Training and much more. He now offers Instructor Training and Certification approved by the PGA and LPGA. Visit: https://impactzonegolf.com or call: 239-236-5536.

105 Comments

105 Comments

  1. Kevin

    Aug 21, 2018 at 1:16 pm

    Problem here is Bobby doesn’t understand that 80% of golfers will not put in the time and effort to improve their swing. They want to get the best performance out of what they have and enjoy the game. One of the first conversations I have with ever client is if they are working with a coach and what the goal of their lessons are. I have turned away plenty of people because I did not feel like their swing was in a good spot for a fitting to properly help them. I have also had that conversation with plenty of golfers where they say they are not going to work on improving their swing and they would like to continue with the fitting. I see more people get messed up by poor instruction that I do by equipment. Reading every article on here by desktop coaches who have no idea what they are talking about or by reading every article in Golf Digest. I don’t see Bobby harping about that because he financially benefits for it. End of the day, I am going to put the equipment in your hand that will work the best for you, but you are still the one swinging the club and I make sure everyone understand that.

  2. Ben Armato

    Aug 7, 2018 at 7:23 pm

    Whatever happened to walking in and buying your favorite looking club, going to range and learning how to hit them? I just bought another set of Mizuno MP-4 with S300’s. I’ve only been playing Mizuno for 25 years and the DGS300 since the late 80’s. I have no interest in what some guy with an analyzer on a shaft will tell me what to play if I smother it or make a lousy swing in the store. I took them to the range and we left best friends. Time for the rest of you to do the same.

  3. CW

    Aug 1, 2018 at 2:07 pm

    Golf requires all pieces to be in order to play really well.

    Think of music – you need a good instrument that fits, but if you don’t have lessons or practice a ton you will never play well.

    If you only practice at home and never for people (range rats), don’t expect to be good at live performances (on course). If you practice and play all the time but have a poorly fit instrument (badly fit clubs) you won’t reach potential either.

    Lessons can and do help A LOT of people get better faster by setting forth a real actionable plan for getting better, imparting knowledge and skills so you can fix your own faults, and axing out any things that will really limit you.

    But BAD lessons can be TERRIBLE and hurt a lot of people of course.

    TLDR: No single thing makes a great player.

  4. ogo

    Jul 29, 2018 at 1:22 am

    Forget club fitting if your body is not fit for golf. Fitness first; then club fitting.

    • Robert Nadjiwan

      Jul 30, 2018 at 6:11 pm

      To become a good ball striker its necessary to develop consistency as the main skill element. Take an entire golf season and practice 60 % of the time and play rounds 40% of the time. Get good with the PW then the 9 iron then the 8 iron etc. Take some lessons to work out any tough spots. Develop a good grip. Irons that have a flatter lie will prove to be more consistent then a club that has a more upright lie.

  5. S

    Jul 28, 2018 at 1:00 pm

    Here’s my experience with fitting.

    1. Around my 5th year, went in to get my irons fitted. Hit toes on the tape. So the fitter kept bending it until 4 degs upright. Still hit the toes. He sent me back saying “Take more lessons”.

    2. About 15 years later, went in to get new fancy “adjustable” drivers fitted. The adjustments turned my fades into draws!… for the first 3 shots. The fades came back thereafter.

    The problem with fitting? In my case, my body adjusted to the clubs. I break 80 occasionally after 27 years of torture. Maybe I just SUCK at golf.

    • ogo

      Jul 29, 2018 at 1:25 am

      Congratulation with your homemade golf swing… and if you play in the 80s you are in the top 2.1% of all golfers worldwide (according to PGA statistics).

    • Peter McGill

      Jan 4, 2019 at 3:13 am

      Breaking 80 is the grail! Embrace it.

  6. Harv

    Jul 26, 2018 at 7:35 pm

    2 big problems with club fitting…. you can’t fit clubs for somebody who invents a new swing each time they try… and, golfers with big bellies can’t swing in to out because they must swing out and in and around their belly.

    • David Aceto

      Jan 14, 2019 at 6:02 pm

      harv you couldnt have said it better i have been playing golf 29 years or should i say golf swing for 29 years i have a new swing every time out and i have a major size belly all my divots point left i hit it pretty straight with excellent tempo but nowhere i was told to get fit but without a repetive swing and 70 mph per swing speed good luck with that just like a senior tour caddy said just hit it and chase it

  7. Tim

    Jul 25, 2018 at 9:23 am

    This sounds like an article that is trying to lead to more golf lessons…

    Spin club fitting into unnecessary, buy more of my lessons.

    • ogo

      Jul 26, 2018 at 3:57 pm

      A good swing instructor will milk thousand$$$$ from fat rich gullible goffers in futile lessons. 😮

      • Bob Pegram

        Jul 30, 2018 at 2:36 am

        That’s NOT the description of a good swing instructor. It is the description of a dishonest one.

        • ogo

          Aug 10, 2018 at 12:00 pm

          No!!! A good instructor will accommodate the desires of a fat rich gullible golfer who is willing to spend spend spend on golf lessons…. in the hope his physical impediment can be overcome with lessons. “A fool and his money are soon parted.”!

  8. Eric G

    Jul 23, 2018 at 1:38 pm

    What are the fitters qualifications???? Equipment being designed to correct swing flaws in lieu of practice are only a part of the problem. I’m 49, starting golfing at 46..went from 120’s to mid-80’s in 3 years….and am slowly flirting with breaking 80. The driver was the LAST thing I worked on. Started from the green out, and work on my wedge game daily. There is a great deal of misinformation, and misunderstanding with today’s fitters. Too much time is wasted looking at “numbers” and regurgitating info they’re fed by manufactures, standardized training, and sharing “what works for them”. How could you possibly teach the same swing to a 6’4” lean guy, that you do to a 5’ 11” barrel chest guy, and expect the same result? To compare with the world of auto repair, it’s the difference between an actual mechanic, and a parts replacer they call a mechanic. Selling wedges hitting off a mat, and full swings with 60 and 58 lofts..LMAO. And not ONE of the “fitters” said no…..

    I’ve done more from my game swinging clubs in the backyard at NO ball, and watching my divots, than I could ever glean from the range.

    If I had a nickel every time I’m paired with someone that ask“ I hit my 9 iron X, what about you?”, or the guy that hits the occasional 280 drive, but every 3rd shot is in the woods. THESE are the people who ultimately get frustrated and quit golf when adding up the score at the end. My son is 6’4”, a college pitcher, and very athletic. He hits a legit 280-290 carry drive….BUTT, he hits his 9 iron 100, 140, and 135…..yes, that’s the problem. He also invest NO time in his short game….it’s all about how far he can hit each club….sound familiar at the fittings?

    After much back and forth, he starting to understand on one particular hole. It was a 359yd hole he was 57 from the drive, I was 127. After about 10 min….I was par after lipping the birdie, he was putting triple bogie. He turned to me and said “I guess it really doesn’t matter how far I hit a ball”. I replied “to a certain extent, no”. It’s about repeating swings, and repeatable distance for each club. When I’m X distance, I know what club I’m going to grab. (for the most part).

    These are the things that aren’t practiced or taught by the “fitter”. It’s all about the “best numbers” for a particular club they’re pushing. Therein lies ONE of the problems with the golf industry…..they’re chopping down trees to make paper, but they aren’t planting new trees.

  9. Davis

    Jul 22, 2018 at 1:48 am

    This is really outstanding and something I have been harping on for years. You will have zero chance of becoming an accomplished player if you rely on game improvement clubs and tailor your swing to match them. They are all draw/hook biased. Every last one of them. What he is really saying is learn how to hit a blade and appreciate the feedback you get when you swing correctly. While I agree with that I think there should be a happy medium and more offerings should be available in the middle, i.e., a game improvement club with very little to no offset.

    • ogo

      Jul 22, 2018 at 1:34 pm

      Yes… “learn to hit a blade to appreciate the feedback you get when you swing correctly.”
      Furthermore, learn to hit 1 or 2-irons before you attempt to swing a Driver… because if you can’t hit a long iron you most certainly can’t hit with a Driver. Buy a Driving Iron and practice with it at the golf range.

  10. J

    Jul 21, 2018 at 4:56 am

    This still misses the point. The only part I’ll give props to is fitting for distance in irons. This is probably a huge issue, as accuracy is far better to fit for than distance.

    The first point can be corrected by teaching players how to swing in to out. All out to in paths will slice or fade unless the face is more closed to the path. You can’t fit a club that fixes and out to in swing path.

    • ogo

      Jul 22, 2018 at 1:30 pm

      Since 95% of all golfers worldwide slice… because of out to in clubhead path into impact… there is only ONE BIG PROBLEM… YOU!!!!

  11. ogo

    Jul 21, 2018 at 1:26 am

    Club fitting for recreational players with homemade golfswings is a best guess trial and error and error and error exercise in futility… because no two rec’n golfswings are the same… it’s a comedy of errors… 😛

  12. ogo

    Jul 20, 2018 at 5:52 pm

    99.9% of all ‘golfers’ worldwide have atrocious “home-made” golf swings… and all of them believe a couple of quick “golf tips” will solve all their swing woes.
    “Golfers are gullible.” – H. Pennick, Little Red Book, pg. 74…. believe it.

  13. Paul

    Jul 18, 2018 at 4:10 pm

    I quit… Sort of. I learned to swing to hard and I wasn’t fit enough to do it. Now I hurt all over. So I take my kid once in a while and fight the urge to try and kill the ball.

    • ogo

      Jul 20, 2018 at 5:46 pm

      The most important piece of golf equipment is ….. YOUR BODY…!!!!!

  14. Bert Gwaltney

    Jul 17, 2018 at 6:34 pm

    Good article and good thoughts, but anyone I’ve met that wanted to grow the game, or improve club fitting or improve my game really only wanted to grow their wallet.

    • Bob Pegram

      Jul 30, 2018 at 2:47 am

      You have apparently never met a skilled clubfitter. A good clubfitter knows how to teach and fit clubs to a golfer so and improved swing won’t be penalized by game improvement clubs that correct for a bad swing.
      For example, the lie angle of clubs is extremely important but is, unfortunately, not explained to the student by most clubfitters. If a club strikes the ball when it is flat on the ground rather than toe up or heel up, the area on the face available to hit the ball reasonably well is maximized increasing the likelihood of a good shot. Hitting the ball on the heel or toe when it is off the ground is not a recipe for a good shot.

  15. Jason

    Jul 16, 2018 at 9:49 am

    I think his real complaint could be summed up as “there are too many counter jockeys parading as club fitters and doing a disservice to the golfing public.” Honestly, a could fitter would never go so far as to bend a club 8 degrees upright to correct a fade/slice. That is something you see with folks getting fit at big box stores. Get fit by a qualified professional and you will be just fine.

    • aknow11

      Jul 19, 2018 at 12:22 pm

      Qualified professional? Oxymoron? How do you know who is really qualified? Most “professionals” I meet in medicine are not professional nor qualified. When I stalk “professionals” on the range, giving lessons, the only ones who make any sense are teaching 8-10 year old children.

  16. Paul

    Jul 15, 2018 at 1:54 pm

    Clampett’s article would have a lot more credibility if he actually understood what movable weight do to change ball flight (hint: it’s not making the heel, or toe, move slower).

  17. Donn Rutkoff

    Jul 14, 2018 at 12:08 am

    Thank you Bobby. Xlnt. Golf is hard to do right and many try it and dont put in the practice or study. So be it. Recall the saying “Give a man a fish u feed him once. Teach him how to fish and he will spend all weekend in a boat drinking beer.”

  18. Jim McPherson

    Jul 13, 2018 at 5:53 pm

    Another problem is the wrong people are going in for a fitting because it’s the new cool thing to do in Golf.

    These people suck and play a couple times a month and refuse to practice. They don’t have a consistent swing and they’re all over the place with every club. Thus, they go in and get fitted for clubs that try to put a band-aid on horrible swing flaws.

    Fitters need to just charge $20 and turn these people away after a handful of swings. Don’t waste the fitters or customers time. Give them sound advice to take some lessons and get a repeatable swing before getting fitted for new clubs.

    • Jim

      Jul 13, 2018 at 11:37 pm

      Mostly true! Really ‘fitting’
      -like we’re talking about here- a bad swing someone could change with some lessons & practice won’t be precise, or ‘fitting’ the chopper who’s honest & says they won’t be doin the lesson thing & just want good clubs for when they do get to play, the fitter CAN make sure the clubs physically FIT the client. Appropriate shaft weight, flex, length & grip size should be picked to BETTER fit that person, thus giving them a much better chance of improving – if they’re trying to, or just hit a few better shots & enjoy their dozen rounds a year more..

      Get all the physical stuff right & the lie angle ‘close’ and the fitter has done this ‘golfer’ a huge service.

  19. Dave

    Jul 13, 2018 at 5:35 pm

    I agree. Bradley Hughes (GolfAus on YouTube) says similar things. Flatter lie angle with heavier clubs and learn to swing better.

  20. Steve “Pops” Adams

    Jul 13, 2018 at 1:15 pm

    Sometimes playing too much can hurt a person‘s game especially as you get older. A friend of mine once told me as we were playing two days in a row …. We could play the same pin placements,same climate, same Equipment , every day of the week but never play the same course.
    One day it’s my back, next the leg, hands, etc.
    Play twice a week. Play nine. Be smart.
    A lot of times it’s not the clubs. Maybe just the inconsistencies.

    • Caroline

      Jul 13, 2018 at 1:52 pm

      Add to what you say the fact one day it is the lead arm pulling through, next day it is the trail arm pushing the club through…add to that one day the arms are putting and chipping next day your turning the body in the chip and rocking the shoulders to putt……Golf is a never ending mix of fun……..and you can shoot the same scores with these multi swings day after day…….

      • O

        Jul 13, 2018 at 3:22 pm

        I’ll make it even easier for you:
        Don’t play!
        How about that?
        If you struggle that much about not knowing how a golf swing works, then don’t play. You’re only hurting yourself further.

        • Peter McGill

          Jan 4, 2019 at 3:25 am

          Take a week off…. and then quit…

  21. dtrain

    Jul 13, 2018 at 1:10 pm

    To biggest problems? hardly. The 8 degree example is BS, I mean was that really a fitters fault or did someone get a set of clubs from their buddy? Or just buys some Ping Silver dots off ebay with no idea what that meant?

    Bobbys ideas seem to be based of a few examples he as experienced based on the swing philosophy he employs. The golfing machine and he variation of it.

    In Bobby’s mind everyone should be playing blades, drivers with a open face angle, and traditional lofts, whatever that really means. BTW Bobby your 49 degree PW would be considered strong in the 1950’s, so why don’t you go ahead and bend it to 54 so you are really traditional.

    • Jim

      Jul 13, 2018 at 11:48 pm

      Newest student: 6’1″ 270, xxl glove.

      Red dot’s with std grips sold to him off the wall.

      Malpractice!!????????????????

      • ogo

        Jul 22, 2018 at 1:14 am

        “Golfers are gullible.” — H. Pennick, Little Red Book, pg. 74.

    • Bob Pegram

      Jul 30, 2018 at 2:55 am

      He didn’t say everybody should be playing blades. He said people should be fit with clubs that encourage a good swing – that don’t reward bad swings. Or make it harder to make good contact when the swing is good. Golfers should not be penalized by ill-fitting clubs when they improve their swings.

  22. Leftshot

    Jul 13, 2018 at 12:09 pm

    All this is true, but these are just symptoms of a bigger problem: No standards for what makes a proper club fitting.
    – One guy has you make three swings on a strike plate…and calls it a fitting
    – Another moves the weights around…and calls it a fitting
    – Another has three shafts to try on a head, one with a ‘S’, one with an ‘R’, and one marked Senior. Has you try them out and calls it a fitting
    – Another has over 10,000 shaft/head combinations, optimizes lie, loft, swing weight, grip…and calls it a fitting

    They all aren’t the same, and we haven’t even begun to talk about differences in fitting philosophy, skill set, or fitting equipment.

    • Caroline

      Jul 13, 2018 at 1:58 pm

      One guy charges $nothing, another $125,,,,you pay $1200 for a new set of irons, $125 for a supper hour and half fitting…take your clubs out to play and on the forth hole the guy you got parred up with gets a 175 yard hole in one with his 7 iron and says..”it was easy, let me show you the little swing fix I found that really works…your fitting is out the window….

      • Scott

        Jul 21, 2018 at 10:53 pm

        I’m sorry, that is not true. If you video taped your self hitting good shots and bad shots, there is not much of a difference. not enough to throw off a fitting. You would have to go through a major overhaul to throw off a fitting. You body is only going to do what it is going to do. Age and physical shape has more impact that some little tip.

        • Bob Pegram

          Jul 30, 2018 at 2:59 am

          Body proportions don’t change except maybe a little over many years due to aging. The combination of body proportions and swing style/speed/timing are the main factors in fitting clubs.

  23. Troy

    Jul 13, 2018 at 9:26 am

    Agree about the lofts. But 8-degrees up!? I don’t know of a manufacturer that will go that far upright. What do you think the standard lie angle should be on a pitching wedge? 56-degrees?

    • mitch

      Jul 13, 2018 at 10:31 am

      its not 8 degrees up, but when a player is suppose to be 4 deg flat, and the club is 4 up then you get the 8 degrees

      • Troy

        Jul 13, 2018 at 3:22 pm

        4 flat?! Not fit by anyone that knows what they’re doing.

        • Caddy

          Jul 13, 2018 at 8:59 pm

          Never seen 4* flat? You haven’t fit many clubs for Joe six pack have you? Its uncommon but when you aren’t dealing with tour players and you are dealing with people who play 9 holes in the Wednesday night league, that 4* flat hits the ground level and keeps the ball from going 30 yards left… you are a hero and that is a correct fitting that properly effects impact and ball flight. Is that player a candidate for lessons? Probably so. Will he spend the time to take them and practice? Probably not.

          • Troy

            Jul 14, 2018 at 6:05 am

            I’ve fit for thirteen years, from tour players to beginners for a manufacturer at the two best facilities on the planet. No, 4 flat is not something I would do.

            • Caddy

              Jul 16, 2018 at 3:14 pm

              In all seriousness, why would you arbitrarily say 4* flat is not something you would do? With all the different body types and flexibility or lack thereof, everyday players cannot be expected to swing into the ball at the virtually the same angle. Some people bend more from the waist, others stand taller and use more arm swing. Mike Adams effectively describes 3 basic types of swingers based on body dimensions and flexibility. They cannot physically do the same things so how can they arrive at impact in virtually the same place? BTW, I have always heard how flat Hogan was and I had an opportunity to handle his irons years ago at the Hogan Factory in Forth Worth, they seemed very flat at the time. Do you know how many degrees flat his clubs were?

  24. Dave

    Jul 13, 2018 at 8:36 am

    This is why the word Custom Fitting in the golf industry is too commonly used. Getting custom fit at your club or a big box retailer is not the same as going to a place like Club Champion or Cool Clubs. Big box retailers are generally, at best highschool kids on a summer job with limited training. Do yourself a favour and get properly custom fit by on of the big fitting companies and you will see the difference.

    I don’t have an issue with clubs that are biased to help correct ball flight, the game is hard enough as it is and not a lot of people get to play and practice as much as the pros. If a Draw driver help a weekend golfer enjoy the game more then why would someone want to take that away from them. If they had to go back to hitting slices off the planet you can probably bet that that person isn’t going to enjoy it as much and in turn we will start loosing golfers and the industry will continue to no grow.

    Last point – If your fitter is fitting you to 8* upright go find a new fitter because they have no idea what they are doing unless you are T Rex

    • O

      Jul 13, 2018 at 12:04 pm

      Yeah, go get custom fit at a “specialist fitter with training” and overpay for the same clubs, and then sell those clubs a couple months later to your local golf shop because they just don’t work, and buy a much easier set off the rack that work perfectly fine, because you just don’t play enough nor are serious enough, nor will you ever play in any sanctioned event ever

  25. Tony Wright

    Jul 12, 2018 at 8:06 pm

    The Loft Jacking for Distance part of this article is on target. But NO TRUE custom club fitter would ever bend golf club lie angles 8 degrees to reduce slicing. If irons could in fact be bent by 8 degrees. That part of the article should have never been published.

    • O

      Jul 13, 2018 at 12:04 pm

      It’s NOT on target. You’re still allowed only 14 clubs in the bag.

  26. SV

    Jul 12, 2018 at 3:37 pm

    I agree with Bobby Clampett’s Comments. Add to the loft issue the length of today’s clubs. Someone mentioned driver lengths, but irons have followed suit. Irons are on average 1″ longer than the same iron used to be.
    Although not related to this issue directly, most average golfers would be better using a 10 club setup which would eliminate having 2 or even 3 clubs that go the same distance. Example: Driver 11*-13* loft and no longer than 44″, fairway wood (17*/18*), hybrid (23*/24*),6, 7, 8, 9, PW, SW (lofts 30*-55* with 5* gaps) and a putter. This would would also cut down on the expense of a set of clubs.

    • Joe

      Jul 12, 2018 at 11:04 pm

      Mizuno’s are .25” less than old standard… 37.75” 5 iron… standard Iron lengths in most sets I look at that have traditional loft are within a 1/4 inch of this old standard. What I think is actually happening is that the number on the bottom of the club has changed…

    • O

      Jul 13, 2018 at 12:07 pm

      er, no, SV, you are allowed 14 clubs, so if your clubs don’t have proper gapping between them all, then you have the wrong clubs and need get other clubs that will give you better gapping, rather swinging comfortably with a couple of clubs that just sorta do the job but are very close to each other.

    • RB7

      Jul 15, 2018 at 8:38 am

      Agreed, SV. A 10-club setup also fosters more shotmaking ability (and less weight if you walk lol). I’m a 3-handicap and play with ten clubs that were purchased one at a time. All irons bent (flat), and gaps at 5 degree increments.

  27. top dog

    Jul 12, 2018 at 12:19 pm

    I do agree with Bobby on the lofts, on irons you run clubs in bottom end. That why you see clubs on ebay 5-lob(4 wedges). I play a set of Miura’s with leak lofts. What isn’t discussed in article is driver lengths. The pros don’t even hit 45.75 length drivers. Standard on tour is probably 45″, if they can’t hit that length solid what makes OEM’s think amateur’s can.

    • Mmmmooooo

      Jul 13, 2018 at 1:31 am

      Er, yeah, DJ uses exactly 45.75″ so what the heck you talking aboot, Willis?

      • John Krug

        Jul 13, 2018 at 11:48 am

        How tall is DJ?

        • O

          Jul 13, 2018 at 12:07 pm

          6’4″

        • Regis

          Jul 13, 2018 at 1:29 pm

          It’s not so much how tall a player is as how far his hands are from the ground at set up. A player who is 6’4 with 37″ sleeves may play the same length as a player who is 6′ with 35″ sleeves. Also depends on how upright they are and how much knee flex they employ in their normal stance

      • Bob Pegram

        Jul 30, 2018 at 3:45 am

        Body proportions make a big difference. I have a high waist (long legs), relatively short arms, and stand up pretty straight because it is more comfortable and doesn’t stress my back (at 68). My woods and hybrids are 2 inches overlength and my irons are 1-1/2 inches over. I am just over 6 feet tall. I hit these clubs straighter and more consistently than any clubs I have ever had. I also hit it as far as I ever did. Granted this probably wouldn’t work for most people.

  28. darkhors

    Jul 12, 2018 at 11:03 am

    I get what Bobby is saying, but also I think too many people are hung up on the number on the club or the loft numbers. I have a set of F8 One lengths and my gaps are about 15 yards per club from 3 hybrid down to the Gap wedge. I don’t have any issues holding greens with any of my clubs. Part of the fitting should be based on spin and decent angle too, so you know that aside from your gaps being correct, you’re getting the spin and land angles correct to keep the ball on the green. You can irons with “jacked up” lofts and still have distance control. You need both, instruction and proper fitting.

  29. Tourgrinder

    Jul 12, 2018 at 11:00 am

    After reading a recent GOLFWRX article surrounding a survey of many clubfitters about what they thought was wrong with most clubs and clubfitting of most golfers today, I brought up several of these points in the Reply section of that article. Now I see some of the same thoughts and ideas I brought up also coming from Bobby Clampett in a full article. My reply was initially held up for “moderation” by Golfwrx editors and then deleted without seeing the light of day. No policy violations, no insults or snarky commentary like I usually read in other replies. So I wonder what will happen to this Reply? Hmmm.

  30. John

    Jul 12, 2018 at 9:54 am

    Beginner golfers should never be fit for clubs. Get lessons to build a repeatable swing. If your swinging the club differently every time you play the fitting process will be voided.

    • geohogan

      Jul 12, 2018 at 10:47 am

      IMO beginners should be fitted with clubs with lie angle that will encourage the proper impact.
      if lie angle is not right for golfers size, that golfer will swing to adjust to the lie angle of the club, leading to grooving bad moves into impact. If lie angles of the clubs in a beginners bag are all over the place, which isnt uncommon, that golfer wont stand a chance to groove a correct swing.

    • Les McBride

      Jul 12, 2018 at 4:37 pm

      You are correct. They only need to be fitted for one iron and maybee one fw, not a full set.

  31. Charles

    Jul 12, 2018 at 8:46 am

    I don’t see this issue of stronger lofts and distance as a one-sided argument. I understand the gapping argument, but there are other factors that are causing us shorter players to want more distance. For example, I drive the ball around 240 yds and hit a 7 iron about 145 yds to 150 yds. My handicap is approximately 8. I use players irons, so my 7 iron loft is 34 degrees. When I play the up tees, I can shoot in the mid to high 70s. However, the guys I play with are all long hitters, and we play from the back tees. Therefore, instead of hitting mid and short irons on par 3s and approach shots, I am forced to hit hybrids and long irons on par 3s and approach shots. I struggle to shoot in the mid 80s when playing a course this long. It’s a severe disadvantage when I’m hitting 5 irons into greens, and my playing partners are hitting 7 and 8 irons. I’m not trying to get my 8 iron to go 170 yds, but I am trying to get a little help to shorten the club I need on these longer shots.

    This is an example of why you can’t just say gapping is everything and stop strengthening irons. I’d rather have longer hitting mid irons and short irons, while perfecting wedge distances by learning how to hit 1/2 and full shots with all my wedges.

    This is just my take, and the struggle I experience. Maybe if we can stop lengthening golf courses and get back to traditional length courses, we wouldn’t have this problem. Then, I wouldn’t be having to play 450 yd par 4s.

    • Thomas A

      Jul 12, 2018 at 10:02 am

      You’re basing your game on other player’s ability. That is a sure recipe for disaster, as you’ve learned. You shouldn’t be playing the back tees just because your buddies do. I see a need for an ego fitting, not a club fitting.

    • Bob Jones

      Jul 12, 2018 at 10:10 am

      This comment sounds like a letter I would read in the advice column of my morning paper. There’s an easy solution to your problem. Tell your buddies they can play from the blues if they want to, but you’re playing from the whites. You spend your time and money to have fun playing golf, and there is no reason why you should let other people detract from that experience. Your game belongs to you, not anyone else.

    • ders

      Jul 12, 2018 at 10:41 pm

      “I’d rather have longer hitting mid irons and short irons, while perfecting wedge distances by learning how to hit 1/2 and full shots with all my wedges.” but you aren’t hitting longer mid irons and short irons with modern jacked loft clubs, you are hitting long irons with a mid iron number stamped on it and mid irons with a short iron number and wedges with short iron lofts. If you can’t hit a green from 200 yds out with your 24 degree hybrid, you won’t be able to hit it with a 24 degree game improvement iron regardless of what mid iron the manufacturer labelled it.

    • Mike

      Jul 13, 2018 at 8:15 am

      How far are those “back tees”? If you’re looking at 7,000+ yards, move up a tee. You’ll have much more fun!

  32. james

    Jul 12, 2018 at 7:02 am

    This is my experience……….There is good and bad in just about every situation or experience we live through. Good/bad teachers, police, builders, etc…..To say that what Bobby is saying is simply not true throughout the golf industry. I am sure that some of these players went to a bad fitter or to a person trying to make a quick sale, but please, don’t make it sound like going to get fit for irons is going to have a poor outcome. There are good fitters out there. Go find one. If the fitter is not answering your questions or in your opinion not giving you sound?honest advice, move on!

  33. Steven

    Jul 12, 2018 at 5:08 am

    If the 7 travels as far as an ‘old’ 6, we would expect it to be as “disperse” as and ‘old’ 6 iron, rather than an ‘old’ 7 iron. SO — as Bobby so rightly notes, we should not care what is on the bottom; rather we should care about control — does the ‘new’ 7 iron (with loft of an ‘old’ 6) offer the player less dispersion than their ‘old’ 6? If the answer is yes, then they should switch.

    In my view, that is what is lost in this ‘power’ iron discussion. I certainly do not have an answer, as I do not have access to all of these clubs just to test it out and make a video. But, I have not seem anyone dive into that question… So, Crossfield, Shiels, whomever, compare the ‘new’ 7 to the ‘old’ 6 – give us the numbers both on and off the course.

  34. Man

    Jul 12, 2018 at 2:22 am

    Golf is not dying, and we are not losing players. We are just leveling off to a place we should normally be, before it got all blown out of proportion like every other major TV sport (NFL, NBA, NHL, MLB – golf doesn’t need to keep adding courses like these that keep adding teams – but imagine if those leagues had 6 or 8 teams less like they did back in the 90s?) – this is the same effect of everything expanding because people saw space in it to make money from it – but golf can easily go back to the levels before the 90’s and still carry on as if nothing happened – because, even before the 90s, and you can go back another 50 years – we were still playing golf.
    So what’s the problem? Hackers quitting because they shouldn’t have been playing in the first place? Not a big deal.
    Nothing to see here. Move along…..

  35. joey

    Jul 12, 2018 at 1:16 am

    IOW…. it’s a game of futility because rec golfers are gullible and just want the clubs the pros play or endorse. As for the 4 million quitters, they are mostly senior golfers with disintegrating bodies. Youngsters can’t afford golf and prefer delusional video games and twittering with friends long distance. Golf is dying… r.i.p. … rot in perdition.

  36. Richard Douglas

    Jul 12, 2018 at 1:14 am

    I’ve railed against the emphasis on distance in irons for years. I’ve always held that it’s little more than a re-numbering contest. But the problem with that argument was shaft length. Longer irons mean taking shorter clubs for the same distance. If you accept as an axiom that shorter clubs are easier to hit, then having shorter clubs for distances is a good thing. But….

    Bobby also brings out the spin issue. Lower lofts mean lower spin rates. These mean approach shots are harder to stop. So yes, we get greater distances, but with shots that are harder to control. Not good.

    But it’s all an ego thing. Drivers maxed out years ago because of the limits on COR. Irons, because they don’t approach max COR, have been the recent fertile hunting ground for more distance. Sure, some technical improvements have helped (I’m looking at you, TM, with your speed slots). But most of it comes from jacked up lofts so players can feel like they’re popping the ball.

    I decided to ditch it all and go to single-length irons. Now, gapping and distance control are my only concerns. It turns out that I hit the single-length irons even farther than my Pings, but that wasn’t the idea. I wanted consistency and predictability. I got both.

    Back to spin rates. I’ve avoided high-spinning tour balls because I’ve always had a problem with too many RPMs off the driver. But I might want to stay with my low-RPM driver but add a higher-spinning ball. (In my case, going from Snell’s MTB Black to the MTB Red.) It might cut the driver distance down, but it will give me more control (and workability) on approach shots. Hmmmm……

  37. Ben

    Jul 11, 2018 at 11:24 pm

    Just bought a fitted set of COBRA king F8s, and it’s rediculous how they’ve had to start selling 49 degree GAP wedges so they claim I can hit my 7i 20 yds further. My old 7i was 34° the Cobra f8 7i is 29.5°. just rediculous. Not to mention the moron at the shop sold me an unhittable 19.5° 4i instead of upselling me a new fitted hybrid. Old Cleveland 2i was 18°, never even put it in the bag. Same with a wasted Cobra 4i. Clubfitters don’t take the extra five minutes to help build a bag for a golfer, they just want to spend 10 minutes on a sim and finish with a quick sale. No wonder the game is losing golfers, all this technology behind the golfer and no one’s getting better.

    • Larry

      Jul 12, 2018 at 9:31 am

      Why did you buy the 4 iron when you knew how low the loft was? When I ordered my new irons, I just purchased 5-pw and filled in the lower end with hybrids. Guess I don’t understand why you bought those irons if you think the lofts are too strong? Lots of other choices with more reasonable specs.

    • Thomas A

      Jul 12, 2018 at 10:05 am

      My Wilson Staff FG Tour F5 have a nice cavity and are true lofts. I’d highly recommend trading your Cobras for a set.

    • ders

      Jul 13, 2018 at 2:05 am

      My dad has a set of irons from the 50’s that my grandpa used to play. The 1iron is about 20 degrees and the 9 iron is more than 50 degrees – the entire set was playable (as playable as 60 year old blades with no bounce could be) with consistent gapping and you’d only need to buy a putter, a couple of woods and sand wedge to fill out your bag- no need for a pitching wedge or gap wedge. Now you buy a set and in addition to the woods and putter, you need to replace the long irons with hybrids and need to buy 3 or more wedges and then you still have huge yardage gaps in your scoring range. It saddens me that people fall for the marketing these days and its just pathetic when guys like Rick Shiels reviews irons and doesn’t point out how stupid it is to have a PW that goes 130, a 7iron that goes 200 and 4 iron that goes 220.

    • paul b

      Jul 13, 2018 at 3:50 pm

      Go back to using older clubs. Ping ISI or S59s… standard PW loft of 47 degrees. Or Eye2s with PW of 50 degrees. All these jacked up lofts are a joke. PW of 44 degrees???? stupid!

  38. Bt

    Jul 11, 2018 at 10:37 pm

    He lost me when he started talking about irons and wedges routinely being 8 degrees upright. What is he talking about? No one sells irons or wedges 8 degrees upright. You can’t even bend the softest forged club that upright.

  39. Brian

    Jul 11, 2018 at 9:47 pm

    I wish 10 million would quit so I could get a better t-time on the weekends.

  40. JustAGuyWhoHitsAPullFade

    Jul 11, 2018 at 8:04 pm

    One of the biggest issues in golf is finding affordable/quality instruction and then having the time to implement changes.

    I’m sure Bobby Clampett charges hundreds or thousands for instruction, which is great and the market supports it, etc, but that’s not a reality for most golfers. Is anyone in the Golf Digest top-50 under hundreds of dollars an hour? And, not that there aren’t affordable good teachers, but it’s just a reinforcement of the idea that the best instruction is way beyond the average person’s price range. If a good teacher charges $500 a lesson, what am I going to learn from some guy who can only get $40?

    I’ve played my whole life and know that I could use some help with my swing, but I now play 12-15 times a year and have no time to practice. What is the point of taking a lesson if I can’t work on implementing the change.

    I’ve also fit many people for clubs, and will not claim to be a great fitter, but the importance of the distance is confidence. This is not something a great player or a former tour pro or someone pushing instruction maybe understands. Distance doesn’t matter if you are comfortable hitting your 5-iron or if you want to forget numbers, a 38/39 inch club. The vast majority of players are probably not comfortable with that, or at least much more comfortable at 36/37 inches. So, if a fitting or new clubs gives you more distance and more short clubs that will lead to more confidence. That’s what drives me crazy about the whole, “they just changed the numbers on the club,” argument. NO. Average players achieve the same length and same trajectory with a shorter club in their hands. This can be huge. Are you going to hit it straighter? Not necessarily, but almost everyone is better with their wedge than their 8 iron.

    As far as the other aspects of fitting I think there are too many schools of thought that can all have success to get into a debate, but it’s crazy to me to think if someone is playing 845s or honestly even something more than 5-6 years old in irons/hybrids that they wouldn’t be better off spending $1000 on the new tech (fitted as best as possible) vs. taking lessons with something that is out of date and hoping they can find a good teacher/have the time to implement etc.

    • Don

      Jul 14, 2018 at 6:42 am

      I think we players are more responsible for the fitting debacle (educate yourselves and own the process, folks) and the industry is more responsible for the instruction debacle. I’ve taken lessons for a lot of years and it’s been all over the spectrum. One wants you to rebuild your swing, another wants you to tweak what you’ve got and forget the rebuild, another teaches a method v what may be better for you, and others have had no real instruction in how to teach and are truly terrible for golfers. I called Golf-Tec and told them I’d gladly pay their $1500 for a top package provided they did just one thing – commit to an outcome. I’d commit to their lessons, I’d practice in their facility as many times as they recommended, and I’d play twice a week. In other words, I’d put in the work and pay the money for their program but they needed to commit to an outcome or they had to give me my money back. Funny, they declined.

  41. Justa clubfitter

    Jul 11, 2018 at 7:46 pm

    Pretty sure you cant make a club 8 degrees upright so pretty sure Bobby you have no idea how to fit or what your talking about as a pro….I’ve learned pros are swing correctors not fitters and you pretty much solidify that either this bs article.

    • Jode Powell

      Jul 11, 2018 at 8:38 pm

      Yes you can.. For ever 1/2 longer the degree of upright goes up 1.. My clubs are 2 inches longer we which us 4 degree upright and bent 4 degree upright. Thats 8 degree upright. My neighbor had his clubs tested and they were 6 degree upright.. They can do it..

    • Harry

      Jul 12, 2018 at 8:34 pm

      Henry Griffitts can bend them that much

  42. Mat

    Jul 11, 2018 at 6:11 pm

    Golf is a target game. Glad he’s pointing out this stuff.

  43. Pingbrad

    Jul 11, 2018 at 5:07 pm

    Bobby’s comments are spot on. Proper gapping between irons is correct regardless of what number is on the irons. And get the swing straightened out first before getting fitted. Otherwise, you’ll get fir for a swing that you will eventually get fixed.

  44. Nick W

    Jul 11, 2018 at 4:53 pm

    What vendors or companies fit lie angles to 8 degrees upright besides Henry Griffiths?

    • 3puttPar

      Jul 11, 2018 at 6:47 pm

      Club Champion and GolfTec. Ive seen plenty of students start there, get fitted, and their swing has never been addressed.

      Its ridiculous.

Leave a Reply

Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

19th Hole

Vincenzi’s 2024 Valspar Championship betting preview: Elite ballstrikers to thrive at Copperhead

Published

on

The PGA TOUR will stay in Florida this week for the 2024 Valspar Championship.

The Copperhead Course at Innisbrook Resort is a par 71 measuring 7,340 yards and features Bermudagrass greens overseeded with POA. Infamous for its difficulty, the track will be a tough test for golfers as trouble lurks all over the place. Holes 16, 17 and 18 — also known as the “Snake Pit” — make up one of the toughest three-hole stretches in golf and should lead to a captivating finish on Sunday.

The field is comprised of 156 golfers teeing it up. The field this week is solid and is a major improvement over last year’s field that felt the impact of players skipping due to a handful of “signature events” in a short span of time. 

Past Winners at Valspar Championship

  • 2023: Taylor Moore (-10)
  • 2022: Sam Burns (-17)
  • 2021: Sam Burns (-17)
  • 2019: Paul Casey (-8)
  • 2018: Paul Casey (-10)
  • 2017: Adam Hadwin (-14)
  • 2016: Charl Schwartzel (-7)
  • 2015: Jordan Spieth (-10)

In this article and going forward, I’ll be using the Rabbit Hole by Betsperts Golf data engine to develop my custom model. If you want to build your own model or check out all of the detailed stats, you can sign up using promo code: MATTVIN for 25% off any subscription package (yearly is best value). 

Key Stats For Copperhead

1. Strokes Gained: Approach

Strokes Gained: Approach grades out as the most important statistic once again this week. Copperhead really can’t be overpowered and is a second-shot golf course.

Total SG: Approach Over Past 24 Rounds (per round)

  1. Tony Finau (+.90)
  2. Nick Taylor (+.81)
  3. Justin Thomas (+.77)
  4. Greyson Sigg (+.69)
  5. Christiaan Bezuidenhout (+.67)

2. Good Drive %

The long hitters can be a bit limited here due to the tree-lined fairways and penal rough. Playing from the fairways will be important, but laying back too far will cause some difficult approaches with firm greens that may not hold shots from long irons.

Golfers who have a good balance of distance and accuracy have the best chance this week.

Good Drive % Over Past 24 Rounds

  1. Brice Garnett (+91.3%) 
  2. Zach Johnson (+91.1%)
  3. Sam Ryder (+90.5%)
  4. Ryan Moore (+90.4%)
  5. Aaron Rai (+89.7%)

3. Strokes Gained: Ball Striking

Adding ball-striking puts even more of a premium on tee-to-green prowess in the statistical model this week. Golfers who rank highly in ball-striking are in total control of the golf ball which is exceedingly important at Copperhead.

SG: Ball Striking Over Past 24 Rounds:

  1. Xander Schauffele (+1.32)
  2. Keith Mitchell (+1.29)
  3. Tony Finau (+1.24)
  4. Cameron Young (+1.17) 
  5. Doug Ghim (+.95)

4. Bogey Avoidance

With the conditions likely to be difficult, avoiding bogeys will be crucial this week. In a challenging event like the Valspar, oftentimes the golfer who is best at avoiding mistakes ends up on top.

Gritty golfers who can grind out difficult pars have a much better chance in an event like this than a low-scoring birdie-fest.

Bogey Avoidance Over Past 24 Rounds

  1. Brice Garnett (+9.0)
  2. Xander Schauffele (+9.3)
  3. Austin Cook (+9.7) 
  4. Chesson Hadley (+10.0)
  5. Greyson Sigg (+10.2)

5. Strokes Gained: Total in Difficult Conditions

Conditions will be tough this week at Copperhead. I am looking for golfers who can rise to the occasion if the course plays as difficult as it has in the past.

Strokes Gained: Total in Difficult Conditions Over Past 24 rounds

  1. Xander Schauffele (+1,71) 
  2. Min Woo Lee (+1.39)
  3. Cameron Young (+1.27)
  4. Jordan Spieth (+1.08)
  5. Justin Suh (+.94)

6. Course History

That statistic will tell us which players have played well at Copperhead in the past.

Course History Over Past 24 rounds

  1. Patrick Cantlay (+3.75) 
  2. Sam Burns (+2.49)
  3. Davis Riley (+2.33)
  4. Matt NeSmith (+2.22)
  5. Jordan Spieth (+2.04)

The Valspar Championship Model Rankings

Below, I’ve compiled overall model rankings using a combination of the five key statistical categories previously discussed — SG: Approach (27%), Good Drive % (15%), SG: BS (20%), Bogeys Avoided (13%), Course History (13%) Strokes Gained: Total in Difficult Conditions (12%).

  1. Xander Schauffele
  2. Doug Ghim
  3. Victor Perez
  4. Greyson Sigg
  5. Ryan Moore
  6. Tony Finau
  7. Justin Thomas
  8. Sam Ryder
  9. Sam Burns
  10. Lucas Glover

2024 Valspar Championship Picks

Justin Thomas +1400 (DraftKings)

Justin Thomas will be disappointed with his finish at last week’s PLAYERS Championship, as the past champion missed the cut despite being in some decent form heading into the event. Despite the missed cut, JT hit the ball really well. In his two rounds, the two-time major champion led the field in Strokes Gained: Approach per round.

Thomas has been up and down this season. He’s missed the cut in two “signature events” but also has finishes of T12 at the Arnold Palmer Invitational, T12 at the Waste Management Phoenix Open, T6 at the Pebble Beach AT&T Pro-Am and T3 at the American Express. In his past 24 rounds, he ranks 3rd in the field in Strokes Gained: Approach and 6th in Strokes Gained: Ball Striking in the field.

Thomas loves Copperhead. In his last three tries at the course, he’s finished T13, T3 and T10. Thomas would have loved to get a win at a big event early in the season, but avoidable mistakes and a balky putter have cost him dearly. I believe a trip to a course he loves in a field he should be able to capitalize on is the right recipe for JT to right the ship.

Christiaan Bezuidenhout +6000 (FanDuel)

Christiaan Bezuidenhout is playing spectacular golf in the 2024 season. He finished 2nd at the American Express, T20 at Pebble Beach and T24 at the Genesis Invitational before finishing T13 at last week’s PLAYERS Championship.

In his past 24 rounds, the South African ranks 3rd in the field in Strokes Gained: Approach and 26th in Strokes Gained: Ball Striking. Bezuidenhout managed to work his way around TPC Sawgrass last week with minimal damage. He only made five bogeys in the entire week, which is a great sign heading into a difficult Copperhead this week.

Bezuidenhout is winless in his PGA Tour career, but certainly has the talent to win on Tour. His recent iron play tells me that this week could be a breakthrough for the 35-year-old who has eyes on the President’s Cup.

Doug Ghim +8000 (FanDuel)

Doug Ghim has finished in the top-16 of his past five starts. Most recently, Ghim finished T16 at The PLAYERS Championship in a loaded field.

In his past 24 rounds, Ghim ranks 8th in Strokes Gained: Approach and 5th in Strokes Gained: Ball Striking. In terms of his fit for Copperhead, the 27-year-old ranks 12th in Bogey Avoidance and 7th in Strokes Gained: Total in Difficult Conditions, making him a great fit for the course.

Ghim has yet to win on Tour, but at one point he was the top ranked Amateur golfer in the world and played in the 2017 Arnold Palmer Cup and 2017 Walker Cup. He then won the Ben Hogan award for the best male college golfer in 2018. He certainly has the talent, and there are signals aplenty that his talent in ready to take him to the winner’s circle on the PGA Tour.

Sepp Straka +8000 (BetRivers)

Sepp Straka is a player who’s shown he has the type of game that can translate to a difficult Florida golf course. The former Presidents Cup participant won the 2022 Honda Classic in tough conditions and should thrive with a similar test at Copperhead.

It’s been a slow 2024 for Straka, but his performance last week at the PLAYERS Championship surely provides some optimism. He gained 5.4 strokes on approach as well as 1.88 strokes off the tee. The tee-to-green game Straka showed on a course with plenty of danger demonstrates that he can stay in control of his golf ball this week.

It’s possible that the strong performance last week was an outlier, but I’m willing to bet on a proven winner in a weaker field at a great number.

Victor Perez +12000 (FanDuel)

Victor Perez is no stranger to success in professional golf. The Frenchman has three DP World Tour wins including a Rolex Series event. He won the 2019 Alfred Dunhill Links Championship, as well as the 2023 Abu Dhabi HSBC Championship, which are some big events.

Perez earned his PGA Tour card this season and enters the week playing some fantastic golf. He finished in a tie for 16th in Florida at the Cognizant Classic and then tied for third in his most recent start at the Puerto Rico Open.

In his past 24 rounds in the field, Perez ranks 11th in Strokes Gained: Approach, 1oth in Strokes Gained: Ball Striking, 6th in Good Drive % and 15th in Bogey Avoidance.

Perez comes in as a perfect fit for Copperhead and offers serious value at triple-digit odds.

Your Reaction?
  • 6
  • LEGIT1
  • WOW0
  • LOL0
  • IDHT0
  • FLOP1
  • OB1
  • SHANK2

Continue Reading

Opinion & Analysis

Myrtle Beach, Explored: February in South Carolina

Published

on

As I gain in experience and age, and familiarity breeds neither contempt nor disdain, I understand why people return to a place. A destination like Myrtle Beach offers a sizable supply and diversity of restaurants, entertainment venues, and shops that are predicated on the tenets of the service industry. Greet your customers with a smile and a kind word, and they will find comfort and assurance. Provide them with a memorable experience and they will suggest your place of business to others.

My first tour of Myrtle Beach took place in the mid-1980s, and consisted of one course: Gator Hole. I don’t remember much from that day, and since Gator Hole closed a decade later, I cannot revisit it to recollect what I’d lost. Since then, I’ve come to the Grand Strand a few times, and been fortunate to never place a course more than once. I’ve seen the Strantz courses to the south and dipped my toe in the North Carolina courses of Calabash. I’ve been to many in the middle, including Dunes, Pine Lakes, Grande Dunes among them.

2024 brought a quartet of new courses, including two at the Barefoot Resort. I’d heard about the North Myrtle Beach four-pack of courses that highlight the Barefoot property, including layouts from Pete Dye, Tom Fazio, Davis Love III, and Greg Norman. I had the opportunity to play and shoot the Dye and Fazio tracks, which means that I’ll have to return to see the other two. Sandwiched between them were the TPC-Myrtle Beach course, also from Tom Fazio, and the Pawley’s Plantation trace, by the hand of Jack Nicklaus. I anticipated a bit of the heroic, and bit of the strategic, and plenty of eye candy. None of those architects would ever be considered a minimalist, so there would be plenty of in-play and out-of-play bunkers and mounds to tantalize the senses.

My nephew arrived a few days early, to screen a few more courses. As a result, you the reader will have an extra quarter of mini-reviews, bringing the total of courses in this piece to eight. It was inconceivable that CJR would play four courses that I had never played nor photographed, but that was the case. His words appear at the end of this piece. We hope that you enjoy the tour.

Main Feature: Two Barefoots, a TPC, and Pawley’s Plantation

Barefoot Dye

What Paul “Pete” Dye brought back from his trips to the United Kingdom, hearkened back to what C.B. MacDonal did, some 65 years prior. There is a way of finding bunkers and fairways, and even green sites, that does not require major industrial work. The Dye course at Barefoot Resorts takes you on a journey over the rumpled terrain of distant places. If there’s one element missing, it’s the creased and turbulent fairways, so often found in England and Ireland. The one tenet of playing a Dye course, is to always aim away from temptation, from where your eyes draw you. Find the safe side of the target, and you’ll probably find your ball. It then stands that you will have a shot for your next attempt. Cut the corner, and you might have need to reload. The Barefoot course begins gently, in terms of distance, but challenges with visual deception. After two brief 4s and a 3, the real work begins. The course is exposed enough, to allow the coastal winds to dance along the fairways. Be ready to keep the ball low and take an extra club or two.

TPC-Myrtle Beach

If memory serves, TPCMB is my first trek around a TPC-branded course. It had all the trappings of a tour course, from the welcome, through the clubhouse, to the practice facilities and, of course, the course. TPC-Myrtle Beach is a Tom Fazio design, and if you never visit Augusta National, you’ll now have an idea of what it is like. You play Augusta’s 16th hole twice at TPCMB, and you enjoy it both times. Fazio really likes the pond-left, green-angle-around par three hole, and his two iterations of it are memorable.

You’ll also see those Augusta bunkers, the ones with the manicured edges that drop into a modestly-circular form. What distinguishes these sand pits is the manner in which they rise from the surrounding ground. They are unique in that they don’t resemble the geometric bunkering of a Seth Raynor, nor the organic pits found in origin courses. They are built, make no mistake, and recovery from them is manageable for all levels of bunker wizardry.

Barefoot Fazio

If you have the opportunity to play the two Tom Fazio courses back to back, you’ll notice a marked difference in styling. Let me digress for a moment, then circle back with an explanation. It was written that the NLE World Woods course designed by Fazio, Pine Barrens, was an homage to Pine Valley, the legendary, New Jersey club where Fazio is both a member and the architect on retainer. The Pine Barrens course was plowed under in 2022, so the homage no longer exists. At least, I didn’t think that it existed, until I played his Barefoot Resort course in North Myrtle Beach.

Pine Valley might be described as an aesthetic of scrub and sand. There are mighty, forced carries to travers, along with sempiternal, sandy lairs to avoid. Barefoot Fazio is quite similar. If you’re not faced with a forced carry, you’ll certainly contend with a fairway border or greenside necklace of sand. When you reach the 13th tee, you’ll face a drive into a fairway, and you might see a distant green, with a notable absence: flagstick. The 13th is the icing on the homage cake, a callout of the 8th hole at Pine Valley. Numero Ocho at the OG has two greens, side by side, and they change the manner in which the hole plays (so they say.) At Barefoot Fazio, the right-side green is a traditional approach, with an unimpeded run of fairway to putting surface. The left-side green (the one that I was fortunate to play) demands a pitch shot over a wasteland. It’s a fitting tribute for the rest of us to play.

Be certain to parrot the starter, Leon’s, advice, and play up a deck of tees. Barefoot Fazio offers five par-three holes, so the fours and fives play that much longer. Remember, too, that you are on vacation. Why not treat yourself to some birdie looks?

Pawley’s Plantation

The Jack Nicklaus course at Pawley’s Plantation emerged from a period of hibernation in 2024. The greens were torn up and their original contours were restored. Work was overseen by Troy Vincent, a member of the Nicklaus Architecture team. In addition, the putting corridors were reseeded with a hardier, dwarf bermuda that has experienced great success, all along the Grand Strand that is Myrtle Beach.

My visit allowed me to see the inward half first, and I understand why the resort wishes to conclude your day on those holes. The front nine of Pawley’s Plantation works its way through familiar, low country trees and wetlands. The back nine begins in similar fashion, then makes its way east, toward the marsh that separates mainland from Pawley’s Island. Recalling the powerful sun of that Wednesday morning, any round beginning on the second nine would face collateral damage from the warming star. Much better to hit holes 11 to close when the sun is higher in the sky.

The marshland holes (12 through 17) are spectacular in their raw, unprotected nature. The winds off the Atlantic are unrelenting and unforgiving, and the twin, par-three holes will remain in your memory banks for time’s march. In typical Golden Bear fashion, a majority of his putting targets are smallish in nature, reflecting his appreciation for accurate approach shots. Be sure to find the forgiving side of each green, and err to that portion. You’ll be grateful.

Bonus Coverage: Myrtlewood, Beechwood, Arrowhead, and King’s North

Arrowhead (Raymond Floyd and Tom Jackson)

A course built in the middle of a community, water threatens on most every hole. The Cypress 9 provides a few holes forcing a carried drive then challenge you with water surrounding the green. On Waterway, a drivable 2nd hole will tempt most, so make sure the group ahead has cleared the green.

Myrtlewood (Edmund Alt and Arthur Hills) and Beechwood (Gene Hamm)

A middle of the winter New Englander’s paradise. Wide open fairways, zero blind shots and light rough allow for shaking off the rust and plenty of forgiveness. A plethora of dog legs cause one to be cautious with every tee shot. Won’t break the bank nor the scorecard.

King’s North @ Myrtle Beach National (Arnold Palmer)

A signature Arnold Palmer course, waste areas, island greens and daring tee shots. Highlighted by the 4th hole Par 5 Gambler hole, if you can hit the smaller fairway on the left you are rewarded with a short approach to get to the green in 2. The back 9 is highlighted by an island green par 3 and a finisher with over 40 bunkers spread throughout. A challenge for any golfer.
Your Reaction?
  • 2
  • LEGIT0
  • WOW0
  • LOL0
  • IDHT0
  • FLOP1
  • OB0
  • SHANK1

Continue Reading

19th Hole

Vincenzi’s 2024 Players Championship betting preview: Pete Dye specialists ready to pass tough TPC Sawgrass test

Published

on

The PGA Tour heads to TPC Sawgrass to play in one of the most prestigious and important events of the season: THE PLAYERS Championship. Often referred to as the fifth major, the importance of a PLAYERS victory to the legacy of a golfer can’t be overlooked.

TPC Sawgrass is a par-72 measuring 7,245 yards and featuring Bermudagrass greens. Golfers must be patient in attacking this Pete Dye course.

With trouble lurking at every turn, the strokes can add up quickly. With a par-5 16th that is a true risk-reward hole and the famous par-3 17th island green, the only safe bet at TPC Sawgrass is a bet on an exciting finish.

THE PLAYERS Championship field is often referred to as the strongest field of the year — and with good reason. There are 144 in the field, including 43 of the world’s top 50 players in the OWGR. Tiger Woods will not be playing in the event.

THE PLAYERS is an exceptionally volatile event that has never seen a back-to-back winner.

Past Winners at TPC Sawgrass

  • 2023: Scottie Scheffler (-17)
  • 2022: Cameron Smith (-13)
  • 2021: Justin Thomas (-14)
  • 2019: Rory McIlroy (-16)
  • 2018: Webb Simpson (-18)
  • 2017: Si-Woo Kim (-10)
  • 2016: Jason Day (-15)
  • 2015: Rickie Fowler (-12)In this article and going forward, I’ll be using the Rabbit Hole by Betsperts Golf data engine to develop my custom model. If you want to build your own model or check out all of the detailed stats, you can sign up using promo code: MATTVIN for 25% off any subscription package (yearly is best value). 

5 Key Stats for TPC Sawgrass

Let’s take a look at five metrics key for TPC Sawgrass to determine which golfers boast top marks in each category over their last 24 rounds.

1. Strokes Gained: Approach

Strokes Gained: Approach has historically been far and away the most important and predictive stat at THE PLAYERS Championship. With water everywhere, golfers can’t afford to be wild with their iron shots. Not only is it essential to avoid the water, but it will also be as important to go after pins and make birdies because scores can get relatively low.

Total SG: Approach Over Past 24 Rounds

  1. Tom Hoge (+1.37) 
  2. Scottie Scheffler (+1.20)
  3. Tony Finau (+0.99)
  4. Jake Knapp (+0.83)
  5. Shane Lowry (+0.80)

2. Total Driving

This statistic is perfect for TPC Sawgrass. Historically, driving distance hasn’t been a major factor, but since the date switch to March, it’s a bit more significant. During this time of year, the ball won’t carry quite as far, and the runout is also shorter.

Driving accuracy is also crucial due to all of the trouble golfers can get into off of the tee. Therefore, players who are gaining on the field with Total Driving will put themselves in an ideal spot this week.

Total Driving Over Past 24 Rounds

  1. Rory McIlroy (22)
  2. Akshay Bhatia (25)
  3. Keith Mitchell (25) 
  4. Adam Hadwin (34)
  5. Sam Burns (+39)

3. Strokes Gained: Total at Pete Dye Designs

TPC Sawgrass may be Pete Dye’s most famous design, and for good reason. The course features Dye’s typical shaved runoff areas and tricky green complexes.  Pete Dye specialists love TPC Sawgrass and should have a major advantage this week.

SG: Total (Pete Dye) per round over past 36 rounds:

  1. Patrick Cantlay (+2.02)
  2. Scottie Scheffler (+1.90)
  3. Min Woo Lee (+1.77) 
  4. Sungjae Im (+1.72)
  5. Brian Harman (+1.62) 

4. Strokes Gained: Ball Striking

Prototypical ball-strikers have dominated TPC Sawgrass. With past winners like Sergio Garcia, Henrik Stenson, Webb Simpson, Rory McIlroy and Justin Thomas, it’s evident that golfers must be striking it pure to contend at THE PLAYERS.

SG: Ball Striking Over Past 24 Rounds

  1. Scottie Scheffler (+2.02)
  2. Tony Finau (+1.51)
  3. Tom Hoge (+1.48)
  4. Keith Mitchell (+1.38)
  5. Will Zalatoris (+1.18)

5. Par 5 Average

Par-5 average is extremely important at TPC Sawgrass. With all four of the Par-5s under 575 yards, and three of them under 540 yards, a good amount of the scoring needs to come from these holes collectively.

Par 5 Average Over Past 24 Rounds

  1. Scottie Schefler (+4.31)
  2. Erik Van Rooyen (+4.35)
  3. Doug Ghim (+4.34)
  4. Wyndham Clark (+4.34)
  5. Matt Fitzpatrick (+4.31)

6. Strokes Gained: Florida

We’ve used this statistic over the past few weeks, and I’d like to incorporate some players who do well in Florida into this week’s model as well. 

Strokes Gained: Florida over past 30 rounds:

  1. Scottie Schefler (+2.43)
  2. Erik Van Rooyen (+1.78)
  3. Doug Ghim (+1.78)
  4. Wyndham Clark (+1.73)
  5. Matt Fitzpatrick (+1.69)

7. Strokes Gained: Total on Courses with High Water Danger

With water everywhere at TPC Sawgrass, the blow-up potential is high. It can’t hurt to factor in some players who’ve avoided the “eject” button most often in the past. 

Strokes Gained: Total on Courses with High Water Danger over past 30 rounds:

  1. Scottie Schefler (+2.08)
  2. Rory McIlroy (+1.82)
  3. Tony Finau (+1.62)
  4. Patrick Cantlay (+1.51)
  5. Will Zalatoris (+1.49)

THE PLAYERS Championship Model Rankings

Below, I’ve compiled overall model rankings using a combination of the five key statistical categories previously discussed — SG: Approach (25%), Total Driving (20%), SG: Total Pete Dye (14%), SG: Ball-striking (15%) SG: Par 5 (8%), SG: Florida (10%) and SG: High Water (8%).

  1. Scottie Scheffler 
  2. Shane Lowry 
  3. Tony Finau 
  4. Corey Conners
  5. Keith Mitchell
  6. Justin Thomas
  7. Will Zalatoris
  8. Xander Schauffele
  9. Cameron Young
  10. Doug Ghim
  11. Sam Burns 
  12. Chris Kirk
  13. Collin Morikawa
  14. Si Woo Kim
  15. Wyndham Clark

2024 THE PLAYERS Championship Picks

(All odds at the time of writing)

Patrick Cantlay +2500 (DraftKings):

Patrick Cantlay is winless since the 2022 BMW Championship but is undoubtedly one of the most talented players on the PGA Tour. Since the win at Wilmington Country Club, the 31-year-old has twelve top-10 finishes on Tour and is starting to round into form for the 2024 season.

Cantlay has done well in the most recent “signature” events this season, finishing 4th at Riviera for the Genesis Invitational and 12th at Bay Hill for the Arnold Palmer Invitational. The former Tour Championship winner resides in Jupiter, Florida and has played some good golf in the state, including finishing in a tie for 4th at the 2023 Arnold Palmer Invitational. His history at TPC Sawgrass has been up and down, but his best career start at The PLAYERS came last year when he finished in a tie for 19th.

Cantlay absolutely loves Pete Dye designed courses and ranks 1st in the field in Strokes Gained: Total on Dye tracks in his past 36 rounds. In recent years, he’s been excellent at both the RBC Heritage and the Travelers Championship. TPC Sawgrass is a place where players will have to be dialed in with their irons and distance off the tee won’t be quite as important. In his past 24, rounds, Cantlay ranks in the field in Strokes Gained: Approach.

Despite being winless in recent years, I still believe Cantlay is capable of winning big tournaments. As one of the only United States players to bring their best game to Marco Simone for the Ryder Cup, I have conviction that the former top amateur in the world can deliver when stakes are high.

Will Zalatoris +3000 (FanDuel):

In order to win at TPC Sawgrass, players will need to be in total control of their golf ball. At the moment, Will Zalatoris is hitting it as well as almost anyone and finally has the putter cooperating with his new switch to the broomstick style.

Zalatoris is coming off back-to-back starts where he absolutely striped the ball. He finished 2nd at the Genesis Invitational and 4th at the Arnold Palmer Invitational where his statistics were eye opening. For the week at Bay Hill, Zal gained 5.0 strokes on approach and 5.44 strokes off the tee.

Throughout the early part of his career, Zalatoris has established himself by playing his best golf in the strongest fields with the most difficult conditions. A tough test will allow him to separate himself this week and breakthrough for a PLAYERS Championship victory.

Shane Lowry +4000 (DraftKings):

History has shown us that players need to be in good form to win the PLAYERS Championship and it’s hard to find anyone not named Scottie Scheffler who’s in better form that Shane Lowry at the moment. He finished T4 at the Cognizant Classic followed by a solo third place finish at the Arnold Palmer Invitational.

The fact that the Irishman contended at Bay Hill is a great sign considering he’s really struggled there throughout his career. He will now head to a different style of course in Florida where he’s had a good deal of success. He finished 8th at TPC Sawgrass in 2021 and 13th in 2022. 

Lowry ranks 6th in the field in approach in his past 24 rounds, 7th in Strokes Gained: Total at Pete Dye designed courses in his last 30 rounds, 8th in par 5 scoring this season, and 4th in Strokes Gained: Total in Florida over his past 36 rounds.

Lowry is a player who’s capable of winning big events. He’s a major champion and won another premier event at Wentworth as well as a WGC at Firestone. He’s also a form player, when he wins it’s typically when he’s contended in recent starts. He’s been terrific thus far in Florida and he should get into contention once again this week.

Brian Harman +8000 (DraftKings):

(Note: Since writing this Harman’s odds have plummeted to 50-1. I would not advise betting the 50).

Brian Harman showed us last season that if the course isn’t extremely long, he has the accuracy both off the tee and with his irons to compete with anyone in the world. Last week at Bay Hill and was third in the field in Strokes Gained: Approach, gaining 5.54 strokes on the field in the category.

In addition to the strong iron play, Harman also gained strokes off the tee in three of four rounds. He’s also had success at Pete Dye tracks recently. He finished 2nd at last year’s Travelers Championship and 7th at the RBC Heritage.

It would be a magnificent feat for Harman to win both the Open Championship and PLAYERS in a short time frame, but the reality is the PGA Tour isn’t quite as strong as it once was. Harman is a player who shows up for the biggest events and his odds seem way too long for his recent track record.

Tony Finau +6500 (FanDuel):

A few weeks ago, at the Genesis Invitational, I bet Hideki Matsuyama because I believed it to be a “bet the number” play at 80-1. I feel similarly about Finau this week. While he’s not having the season many people expected of him, he is playing better than these odds would indicate.

This season, Tony has a tied for 6th place finish at Torrey Pines, a tied for 19th at Riviera and tied for 13th at the Mexico Open. He’s also hitting the ball extremely well. In the field in his past 24 rounds, he ranks 3rd in Strokes Gained: Approach, 3rd in Strokes Gained: Ball Striking, 6th in Par 5 average and 15th in Total Driving.

Finau’s problem has been with the putter, which has been undeniably horrific. However, this week he will see a putting surface similar to the POA at TPC Scottsdale and PGA West, which he’s had a great deal of success on. It’s worth taking a stab at this price to see if he can have a mediocre week with the flat stick.

Sungjae Im +9000 (FanDuel):

It’s been a lackluster eighteen months for Sungjae, who once appeared to be a certain star. While his ceiling is absolutely still there, it’s been a while since we’ve seen Im play the type of golf expected of a player with his talent.

Despite the obvious concerns, the South Korean showed glimpses of a return to form last week at the Arnold Palmer Invitational. He tied for 18th place and gained strokes off the tee, on approach, around the green and with the putter. When at his best, Im is a perfect course fit for TPC Sawgrass. He has remarkable precision off the tee, can get dialed in with his irons on shorter courses and can get up and down with the best players on Tour.

This number has gotten to the point where I feel comfortable taking a shot on it.

Billy Horschel +20000 (FanDuel):

Billy Horschel is a great fit on paper for TPC Sawgrass. He can get dialed in with his irons and his lack of distance off the tee won’t be a major detriment at the course. “Bermuda Billy” does his best work putting on Bermudagrass greens and he appears to be rounding into form just in time to compete at The PLAYERS.

In his most recent start, Billy finished in a tie for 9th at the Cognizant Classic and hit the ball extremely well. The former Florida Gator gained 3.32 strokes on approach and 2.04 strokes off the tee. If Horschel brings that type of ball striking to TPC Sawgrass, he has the type of putter who can win a golf tournament.

Horschel has been great on Pete Dye designed courses, with four of his seven career PGA Tour wins coming on Dye tracks.

In a season that has seen multiple long shots win big events, the 37-year-old is worth a stab considering his knack for playing in Florida and winning big events.

 

Your Reaction?
  • 30
  • LEGIT10
  • WOW4
  • LOL2
  • IDHT0
  • FLOP3
  • OB1
  • SHANK6

Continue Reading

WITB

Facebook

Trending