Connect with us

19th Hole

Apparently, the USGA wanted to roll back the golf ball as early as 1936

Published

on

The golf ball distance debate, stoked to a healthy blaze recently, has been going on since well before pros were belting drives 300 yards.

Indeed, in the transition from the the featherie to the gutta percha ball or from that mound of sap to the Haskell Flyer and similar, one imagines furious debate. But credit to John Strege at Golf Digest for uncovering this gem from the 1936 edition of Golfing.

“During the National Open the United States Golf Association and the leading golf ball makers had a meeting at which time the USGA voiced the opinion it would be inadvisable to attempt to build any greater distance in the golf ball.”

Forget rolling back the ball! The USGA didn’t want the thing to roll any further forward…in 1936?

“The first day of the Open, Paul Runyan, one of the shortest hitters in big-time golf, got an eagle three on the 602-yard eleventh at Baltusrol. That gives you an idea of what confusing details attend this matter of ball legislation. Runyan also was the 1935 winner of the Radix cup for the year’s lowest medal average. Johnny Revolta, who won more prize money than any other player during 1935, is not much longer than Runyan.”

A 602-yard par 5! Even Little Poison and other short hitters were lighting up the 600-yarders in ‘36.

“And to make this thing still more bewildering: the last time the USGA adopted specifications to keep the ball short, the net result was to stir manufacturing ingenuity to the extent that yards were added to the distance of balls, and obsolescence expenses estimate to more more than a half million dollars were added somewhere in the golf ball bill.

Thus, legislation (and limitations), and manufacturer efforts to get around the intended consequences of such limitations by pursuing new technologies, are nothing new.

“Four years ago data was compiled from the handicap lists of New York, Chicago, Detroit and several other district associations, indicating that 92% of the golfers score more than 90. Which again shows that the golf ball problem — if there is one —probably is to reduce the number of sliced, hooked and topped shots rather than the distance of the comparatively few shots hit hard and straight.”

Indeed! Where is that hook-proof ball! If only ball companies had been working on the problem since 1936 we’d all be hitting it straighter than Moe Norman.

What do you think about Strege’s excavation, GolfWRX members?

Your Reaction?
  • 57
  • LEGIT10
  • WOW4
  • LOL1
  • IDHT0
  • FLOP1
  • OB1
  • SHANK13

GolfWRX Editor-in-Chief

19th Hole

LET pro gives detailed financial breakdown of first week on tour…and the net result may shock you

Published

on

On Friday morning, Ladies European Tour player, Hannah Gregg, took to social media to share her weekly expenses playing on the LET.

“Expenses of my first week on Ladies European Tour: Flights: $2600 Work Visa: $350 

  • Food: $377 
  • Caddie: $0 because I have an amazing Fiancé 
  • Hotel: $0 because  @GregChalmersPGA sorted me host housing for the week!  
  • Rental Car: +0 because the Tour Tee guys GAVE me their car  
  • Gas: $165 
  • Entry Fee: $130 
  • Lounge Pass for caddie: $50 
  • Gym: $0 
  • Yardage book: $0 
  • Total expenses: $3672 

Made cut, finished 54th, total earned: $1244 Factor in 35% tax on earnings. To break even, needed to finish 24th. To make money, 21st. Guess we have our goals laid out for next event!”

When factoring in Gregg’s free housing, free caddie and free rental car, it’s evident that most LET players would have to finish well inside of the top-20 to make any money.

With ridiculous amounts of money being thrown around in professional golf these days, it’s important to remember the other side of the coin as well. There are countless professionals out there who struggle to get by on their golf salary.

More from the 19th Hole

Your Reaction?
  • 3
  • LEGIT3
  • WOW5
  • LOL1
  • IDHT1
  • FLOP0
  • OB0
  • SHANK2

Continue Reading

19th Hole

54-hole golf tour deemed eligible for OWGR points…but it’s not LIV

Published

on

After a seventeen-month application process, a 54-hole golf tour was deemed eligible for OWGR points.

Unfortunately, for LIV Golf and their fans, it was the Clutch Pro Tour.

After the decision, which is effective immediately, OWGR chairman Peter Dawson issued a statement.

“This is a significant milestone for golf, and OWGR is deeply encouraged by the achievement and the continued efforts in developing the sport of golf in the United Kingdom.”

“We look forward to watching the progress of the Clutch Pro Tour as it continues to play a key role in the development of players from the region,” Dawson added.

The Clutch Pro Tour operates in the United Kingdom and features a 36-hole cut. It also has an open qualifying school.

More from the 19th Hole

Your Reaction?
  • 4
  • LEGIT1
  • WOW1
  • LOL2
  • IDHT0
  • FLOP0
  • OB2
  • SHANK5

Continue Reading

19th Hole

Charlie Woods attempting to qualify for spot at 2024 U.S. Open

Published

on

As first reported by Bob Harig of Sports Illustrated, Charlie Woods will be attempting to qualify for this year’s U.S. Open at Pinehurst No. 2.

The first stage of qualifying for this year’s tournament will be an 18-hole local event on Thursday, April 25th, in Port St. Lucie, Florida.

There will be 84 players in the field, five of which will reach the 36-hole qualifier that will take place in June.

Earlier this season, Charlie attempted to qualify for the Cognizant Classic, and struggled, shooting an 86.

If the younger Woods is able to qualify, he will tee it up in the same field as his father in a few months at one of the more historic U.S. Open venues.

More from the 19th Hole

Your Reaction?
  • 3
  • LEGIT0
  • WOW0
  • LOL3
  • IDHT0
  • FLOP2
  • OB1
  • SHANK6

Continue Reading

WITB

Facebook

Trending