Connect with us

Opinion & Analysis

Why fair is the wrong adjective for golf

Published

on

You’ll no doubt hear anyone within earshot of an interview this week describe Royal Birkdale as a fair test of golf, perhaps the fairest Open rota test of them all. Please dismiss the speaker as hopelessly tethered to a misconception of epic size.

Golf is not fair. You know it. We can fit our equipment, our apparel, even the courses we play, to take advantage of conditions, but we can never make it fair. In fact, nothing in life is fair, but that’s a topic for Monday’s water cooler or Friday’s happy hour.

Good breaks on the golf course are meant to be celebrated, as are bad ones. We envy the former and we commiserate with the later. We’ve enjoyed one and suffered the other. It is not different with golfing professionals, and if they want it that way, tough beans. They cannot, and should not, have “fair” ever enter the equation.

Have you ever played a farmland course during a drought? That’s links golf. When your fairways are burned to a crisp, yellow like wheat. When the soil seems parched and the dust creeps up slightly, you’ve got the perfect conditions for links golf. Take your putter from 70 yards out and give it a whack. It will bound this way, trundle that. It will hop, skip, carom, ricochet, and might even take unintentional flight. And it will be a wonderful breath of distinction from the game you normally encounter.

If golf were fair, balls would not glance off hazard and out-of-bounds stakes, back into play. Balls would not enter golf holes and spin out, sometimes into hazards. Or would they? Who determines fair? The one who was punished, or the one who was rewarded?

Friends more elegant and eloquent have commented on the nuances that keep golf interesting. They say that uneven lies, unfortunate weather, and unexpected conditions should separate the proper champion from the pretender. I agree. I empathize with tournament players on the wrong side of the draw, but them’s the breaks!

Remember this. A fellow who drains a 45-foot putt on the 72nd green some two hours before the final pairing reaches that same putting surface should not be in contention. A leader who plays a splendid iron into that surface should not be dealt a chip from beyond the green. If golf were fair, Tom Watson would have six Open championships, and Stewart Cink, none.

Now, go out and play some unfair golf. And have an unfair blast the entire round.

Your Reaction?
  • 65
  • LEGIT8
  • WOW3
  • LOL0
  • IDHT0
  • FLOP1
  • OB1
  • SHANK51

Ronald Montesano writes for GolfWRX.com from western New York. He dabbles in coaching golf and teaching Spanish, in addition to scribbling columns on all aspects of golf, from apparel to architecture, from equipment to travel. Follow Ronald on Twitter at @buffalogolfer.

19 Comments

19 Comments

  1. Ronald Montesano

    Jul 20, 2017 at 10:00 am

    So USA!!

    Going to other countries for golf is only part of the opportunity. You get a taste of their style of course condition, but if you don’t golf with locals and imbibe their opinions and attitudes, the taste is unsatisfying.

    Your observations are spot on. Keep commenting!

  2. Matt

    Jul 20, 2017 at 3:10 am

    No such thing as ‘unfair’ in golf. If I want a score that has any relationship to par, or to approach/better my official handicap for that matter, then it’s fair to expect I’ll be challenged by both the course and my lack of ability to advance the ball perfectly. Isn’t that challenge the whole point?

  3. Double Mocha Man

    Jul 19, 2017 at 10:30 pm

    Wait a minute! That’s me, but I have a 2.8 handicap. So it is true of everyone… though my clubs are 7 years old. And the cart girl can never show up soon enough.

  4. james rebey

    Jul 19, 2017 at 7:28 pm

    That is not what they mean by fair. They are speaking to all the field has a shot at winning by playing their game, not just the bombers .

    • Ronald Montesano

      Jul 20, 2017 at 9:56 am

      That’s an angle, for sure. If it’s what the talking heads mean, then there is certainly marrow to that bone.

  5. Lloyd

    Jul 19, 2017 at 6:25 pm

    But some of what he says is true.

  6. Double Mocha Man

    Jul 19, 2017 at 5:30 pm

    Ron, with respect to that drought-stricken farmland course I thought you were going to say something about the 310 yard drive you hit that rolls forever. And that would be fair. And then that wedge you hit into the extra-firm green (brown) that rolls well over the back. That would be unfair.

    • Ronald Montesano

      Jul 20, 2017 at 9:58 am

      No, because that would be taking advantage of a good result while bemoaning a bad one (unless you wanted a short drive and to be chipping from behind the putting surface.)

      I do appreciate your writing, 2XMocha.

  7. Matt-78

    Jul 19, 2017 at 1:56 pm

    I definitely appreciate the article Ronald and agree on the whole that golf should not be considered fair. However, I see the two uses of the word “fair” in the article to be different. For example, when I hear a pro say that a particular course is “a fair test”, what I hear is that it isn’t overly punishing for certain misses or doesn’t reward only one type of shot. However, the sentiment “golf isn’t fair” in my mind refers to the fact that sometimes good shots are punished and bad shots are rewarded. This is true even on the easiest courses. Sometimes your piped drive finds a muddy divot when you hacker buddy’s slice finds an opening, etc. Like when the tree seed fell into Phil’s putt line while he was putting. This is just my .02 though.

    • Ronald Montesano

      Jul 20, 2017 at 10:04 am

      Your pennies are well received, Matt-78.

      There is much to the term, which is why its bland, banal nature is ineffective. We should strive for greater accuracy in our use of language. #NoDumbDownHere

      The test of what we all take to be fair, or just, or deserved, will always be open for discussion, debate and disagreement. All athletic endeavors have similar moments, be it sweat on the hardwood, a sun’s ray in the eyes, or a loose piece of carpet on the football field.

      Let’s not even bring up the impact of referees!

  8. BlubberButt

    Jul 19, 2017 at 11:22 am

    Ronald doesn’t seem to know what the word “fair” means… I get the sentiment and the feeling you’re trying to evoke from the reader, but you picked the wrong word to center the article around. Everything you listed in your article are examples of how golf is actually fair. Physics doesn’t favor one person over the other. Neither does the weather or course design. Maybe the word you meant was “easy”. Like, “Why Easy is the Wrong Adjective for Golf”. The “good and bad breaks” you describe are just the results of the golfer’s actions.

    • BlubberButt

      Jul 19, 2017 at 11:25 am

      Or perhaps “predictable”. “Why predictable is the wrong adjective for golf”.

      • Ronald Montesano

        Jul 19, 2017 at 12:50 pm

        Your word choices are transparent and finite. “Fair” is neither, which is why so many commentators and tournament professionals default to it, and also why I selected it from the lexicon. The euphemism was chosen by the wizard, not the other way around. Any motion on my part to alter the terminology would have been disingenuous.

        • BlubberButt

          Jul 20, 2017 at 12:16 pm

          Apparently your vocabulary rich with polysyllabic words is not an indication of your ability to follow a line a logic. Even if you want to stick with the original terminology provided (“fair”), that doesn’t change the fact that everything about golf is, in fact, fair. The commentators, or “wizards” are correct, and your entire article is saying that somehow it is not fair. It seems like you want to distort the word “fair” to mean something else in order to make your article (although it more accurately amounts to a blog post) hold water. You say “If golf were fair, balls would not glance off hazard and out-of-bounds stakes, back into play. Balls would not enter golf holes and spin out, sometimes into hazards.” Those things don’t make golf unfair. They’re just the results of physics and a golfer’s actions. They’re completely fair.

    • Ronald Montesano

      Jul 19, 2017 at 12:44 pm

      Nope. Fair.

  9. Ronald Montesano

    Jul 19, 2017 at 7:20 am

    Shank fairy strikes again! Don’t know who it is, but always drops in as a +1 in that column. Wouldn’t be the same withoutcha!!

    • Nick Ritacco

      Jul 19, 2017 at 3:58 pm

      Why are you on a golf site?

      • Ronald Montesano

        Jul 20, 2017 at 10:08 am

        Well, he did drop “viscous” and “plethora” during his tirade, so points for those.

        I feel his/her/zee pain, as there is much about the business of golf that can appear to be at odds with the entry to the spiritual that rounds of golf provide.

        Murphy wasn’t off when he wrote about this in Golf In The Kingdom 1 & 2. There is much to gain from our time on the golf fields.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

19th Hole

Vincenzi’s 2024 Zurich Classic of New Orleans betting preview

Published

on

The PGA TOUR heads to New Orleans to play the 2023 Zurich Classic of New Orleans. In a welcome change from the usual stroke play, the Zurich Classic is a team event. On Thursday and Saturday, the teams play best ball, and on Friday and Sunday the teams play alternate shot.

TPC Louisiana is a par 72 that measures 7,425 yards. The course features some short par 4s and plenty of water and bunkers, which makes for a lot of exciting risk/reward scenarios for competitors. Pete Dye designed the course in 2004 specifically for the Zurich Classic, although the event didn’t make its debut until 2007 because of Hurricane Katrina.

Coming off of the Masters and a signature event in consecutive weeks, the field this week is a step down, and understandably so. Many of the world’s top players will be using this time to rest after a busy stretch.

However, there are some interesting teams this season with some stars making surprise appearances in the team event. Some notable teams include Patrick Cantlay and Xander Schauffele, Rory McIlroy and Shane Lowry, Collin Morikawa and Kurt Kitayama, Will Zalatoris and Sahith Theegala as well as a few Canadian teams, Nick Taylor and Adam Hadwin and Taylor Pendrith and Corey Conners.

Past Winners at TPC Louisiana

  • 2023: Riley/Hardy (-30)
  • 2022: Cantlay/Schauffele (-29)
  • 2021: Leishman/Smith (-20)
  • 2019: Palmer/Rahm (-26)
  • 2018: Horschel/Piercy (-22)
  • 2017: Blixt/Smith (-27)

2024 Zurich Classic of New Orleans Picks

Tom Hoge/Maverick McNealy +2500 (DraftKings)

Tom Hoge is coming off of a solid T18 finish at the RBC Heritage and finished T13 at last year’s Zurich Classic alongside Harris English.

This season, Hoge is having one of his best years on Tour in terms of Strokes Gained: Approach. In his last 24 rounds, the only player to top him on the category is Scottie Scheffler. Hoge has been solid on Pete Dye designs, ranking 28th in the field over his past 36 rounds.

McNealy is also having a solid season. He’s finished T6 at the Waste Management Phoenix Open and T9 at the PLAYERS Championship. He recently started working with world renowned swing coach, Butch Harmon, and its seemingly paid dividends in 2024.

Keith Mitchell/Joel Dahmen +4000 (DraftKings)

Keith Mitchell is having a fantastic season, finishing in the top-20 of five of his past seven starts on Tour. Most recently, Mitchell finished T14 at the Valero Texas Open and gained a whopping 6.0 strokes off the tee. He finished 6th at last year’s Zurich Classic.

Joel Dahmen is having a resurgent year and has been dialed in with his irons. He also has a T11 finish at the PLAYERS Championship at TPC Sawgrass which is another Pete Dye track. With Mitchell’s length and Dahmen’s ability to put it close with his short irons, the Mitchell/Dahmen combination will be dangerous this week.

Taylor Moore/Matt NeSmith +6500 (DraftKings)

Taylor Moore has quickly developed into one of the more consistent players on Tour. He’s finished in the top-20 in three of his past four starts, including a very impressive showing at The Masters, finishing T20. He’s also finished T4 at this event in consecutive seasons alongside Matt NeSmith.

NeSmith isn’t having a great 2024, but has seemed to elevate his game in this format. He finished T26 at Pete Dye’s TPC Sawgrass, which gives the 30-year-old something to build off of. NeSmith is also a great putter on Bermudagrass, which could help elevate Moore’s ball striking prowess.

Your Reaction?
  • 6
  • LEGIT2
  • WOW1
  • LOL0
  • IDHT0
  • FLOP3
  • OB1
  • SHANK1

Continue Reading

19th Hole

Vincenzi’s 2024 LIV Adelaide betting preview: Cam Smith ready for big week down under

Published

on

After having four of the top twelve players on the leaderboard at The Masters, LIV Golf is set for their fifth event of the season: LIV Adelaide. 

For both LIV fans and golf fans in Australia, LIV Adelaide is one of the most anticipated events of the year. With 35,000 people expected to attend each day of the tournament, the Grange Golf Club will be crawling with fans who are passionate about the sport of golf. The 12th hole, better known as “the watering hole”, is sure to have the rowdiest of the fans cheering after a long day of drinking some Leishman Lager.  

The Grange Golf Club is a par-72 that measures 6,946 yards. The course features minimal resistance, as golfers went extremely low last season. In 2023, Talor Gooch shot consecutive rounds of 62 on Thursday and Friday, giving himself a gigantic cushion heading into championship Sunday. Things got tight for a while, but in the end, the Oklahoma State product was able to hold off The Crushers’ Anirban Lahiri for a three-shot victory. 

The Four Aces won the team competition with the Range Goats finishing second. 

*All Images Courtesy of LIV Golf*

Past Winners at LIV Adelaide

  • 2023: Talor Gooch (-19)

Stat Leaders Through LIV Miami

Green in Regulation

  1. Richard Bland
  2. Jon Rahm
  3. Paul Casey

Fairways Hit

  1. Abraham Ancer
  2. Graeme McDowell
  3. Henrik Stenson

Driving Distance

  1. Bryson DeChambeau
  2. Joaquin Niemann
  3. Dean Burmester

Putting

  1. Cameron Smith
  2. Louis Oosthuizen
  3. Matt Jones

2024 LIV Adelaide Picks

Cameron Smith +1400 (DraftKings)

When I pulled up the odds for LIV Adelaide, I was more than a little surprised to see multiple golfers listed ahead of Cameron Smith on the betting board. A few starts ago, Cam finished runner-up at LIV Hong Kong, which is a golf course that absolutely suits his eye. Augusta National in another course that Smith could roll out of bed and finish in the top-ten at, and he did so two weeks ago at The Masters, finishing T6.

At Augusta, he gained strokes on the field on approach, off the tee (slightly), and of course, around the green and putting. Smith able to get in the mix at a major championship despite coming into the week feeling under the weather tells me that his game is once again rounding into form.

The Grange Golf Club is another course that undoubtedly suits the Australian. Smith is obviously incredibly comfortable playing in front of the Aussie faithful and has won three Australian PGA Championship’s. The course is very short and will allow Smith to play conservative off the tee, mitigating his most glaring weakness. With birdies available all over the golf course, there’s a chance the event turns into a putting contest, and there’s no one on the planet I’d rather have in one of those than Cam Smith.

Louis Oosthuizen +2200 (DraftKings)

Louis Oosthuizen has simply been one of the best players on LIV in the 2024 seas0n. The South African has finished in the top-10 on the LIV leaderboard in three of his five starts, with his best coming in Jeddah, where he finished T2. Perhaps more impressively, Oosthuizen finished T7 at LIV Miami, which took place at Doral’s “Blue Monster”, an absolutely massive golf course. Given that Louis is on the shorter side in terms of distance off the tee, his ability to play well in Miami shows how dialed he is with the irons this season.

In addition to the LIV finishes, Oosthuizen won back-to-back starts on the DP World Tour in December at the Alfred Dunhill Championship and the Mauritus Open. He also finished runner-up at the end of February in the International Series Oman. The 41-year-old has been one of the most consistent performers of 2024, regardless of tour.

For the season, Louis ranks 4th on LIV in birdies made, T9 in fairways hit and first in putting. He ranks 32nd in driving distance, but that won’t be an issue at this short course. Last season, he finished T11 at the event, but was in decent position going into the final round but fell back after shooting 70 while the rest of the field went low. This season, Oosthuizen comes into the event in peak form, and the course should be a perfect fit for his smooth swing and hot putter this week.

Your Reaction?
  • 10
  • LEGIT3
  • WOW0
  • LOL1
  • IDHT0
  • FLOP1
  • OB1
  • SHANK1

Continue Reading

Opinion & Analysis

The Wedge Guy: What really makes a wedge work? Part 1

Published

on

Of all the clubs in our bags, wedges are almost always the simplest in construction and, therefore, the easiest to analyze what might make one work differently from another if you know what to look for.

Wedges are a lot less mysterious than drivers, of course, as the major brands are working with a lot of “pixie dust” inside these modern marvels. That’s carrying over more to irons now, with so many new models featuring internal multi-material technologies, and almost all of them having a “badge” or insert in the back to allow more complex graphics while hiding the actual distribution of mass.

But when it comes to wedges, most on the market today are still single pieces of molded steel, either cast or forged into that shape. So, if you look closely at where the mass is distributed, it’s pretty clear how that wedge is going to perform.

To start, because of their wider soles, the majority of the mass of almost any wedge is along the bottom third of the clubhead. So, the best wedge shots are always those hit between the 2nd and 5th grooves so that more mass is directly behind that impact. Elite tour professionals practice incessantly to learn to do that consistently, wearing out a spot about the size of a penny right there. If impact moves higher than that, the face is dramatically thinner, so smash factor is compromised significantly, which reduces the overall distance the ball will fly.

Every one of us, tour players included, knows that maddening shot that we feel a bit high on the face and it doesn’t go anywhere, it’s not your fault.

If your wedges show a wear pattern the size of a silver dollar, and centered above the 3rd or 4th groove, you are not getting anywhere near the same performance from shot to shot. Robot testing proves impact even two to three grooves higher in the face can cause distance loss of up to 35 to 55 feet with modern ‘tour design’ wedges.

In addition, as impact moves above the center of mass, the golf club principle of gear effect causes the ball to fly higher with less spin. Think of modern drivers for a minute. The “holy grail” of driving is high launch and low spin, and the driver engineers are pulling out all stops to get the mass as low in the clubhead as possible to optimize this combination.

Where is all the mass in your wedges? Low. So, disregarding the higher lofts, wedges “want” to launch the ball high with low spin – exactly the opposite of what good wedge play requires penetrating ball flight with high spin.

While almost all major brand wedges have begun putting a tiny bit more thickness in the top portion of the clubhead, conventional and modern ‘tour design’ wedges perform pretty much like they always have. Elite players learn to hit those crisp, spinny penetrating wedge shots by spending lots of practice time learning to consistently make contact low in the face.

So, what about grooves and face texture?

Grooves on any club can only do so much, and no one has any material advantage here. The USGA tightly defines what we manufacturers can do with grooves and face texture, and modern manufacturing techniques allow all of us to push those limits ever closer. And we all do. End of story.

Then there’s the topic of bounce and grinds, the most complex and confusing part of the wedge formula. Many top brands offer a complex array of sole configurations, all of them admittedly specialized to a particular kind of lie or turf conditions, and/or a particular divot pattern.

But if you don’t play the same turf all the time, and make the same size divot on every swing, how would you ever figure this out?

The only way is to take any wedge you are considering and play it a few rounds, hitting all the shots you face and observing the results. There’s simply no other way.

So, hopefully this will inspire a lively conversation in our comments section, and I’ll chime in to answer any questions you might have.

And next week, I’ll dive into the rest of the wedge formula. Yes, shafts, grips and specifications are essential, too.

Your Reaction?
  • 32
  • LEGIT7
  • WOW1
  • LOL1
  • IDHT2
  • FLOP3
  • OB1
  • SHANK3

Continue Reading

WITB

Facebook

Trending