Connect with us

Opinion & Analysis

Love this club, hate that club

Published

on

I’ve had a love-it-or-hate-it relationship with certain clubs over the years. Take my 6-iron for example (I wish you would, Rodney Dangerfield might’ve joked). I’d thin it. I’d fat it. I’d let go at impact. I’d leave the clubface open. Pretty important club, too, since I figure if I can get my tee shot to the 150-yard marker, I’d have a decent chance of hitting the green in regulation with the 6.

But the club was like a kid on my block who I just couldn’t warm up to. I couldn’t pinpoint the problem with the kid. He wasn’t a bad kid. Nor was it a whole conglomeration of components out of place like Mr. Wilson’s take on Dennis Mitchell. It was just when I picked up that 6-iron the word “Trouble” flashed on the marquee of my brain. I just knew I wasn’t going to get it there, and maybe even knew on a water hole that it was wet before I even swung the damn thing. Odd, isn’t it, how we develop these relationships with clubs, where one feels like a comfortable pair of fur slippers and another like holding on to a crocodile’s tail.

Fortunately with today’s equipment options, I no longer need to remain locked into a bad marriage with the 6, enduring long hours of golf-elbow-syndrome practice, trying to figure out the right ingredients that would lead to a copacetic relationship with the beast. I don’t have the time, the inclination, nor the disposition for such nonsense. Nor did I have the patience to work with an old-school pro who was still recommending semi-blades and steel shafts to a septuagenarian who had “a beautiful swing,” he kept telling me. He had heard of hybrids, but hadn’t “gotten around to trying them yet.”

Hybrids. Like laptops in the late 20th century, hybrids revolutionized golf choices in the early 21st century, and almost seemed illegal. Here was a club that was swung like mid-iron, but could sweep through gnarly rough like a high-grass mower, and produce a high trajectory that made the ball hover and settle softly, making that nice thump sound indicating that “the eagle has landed” on the surface of the green.

Each year for several years now I’ve gone down to my favorite golf store, first exchanging my 3-iron for a 3-hybrid, then a 4, then a 5. But that’s where I stopped for several years, even after a good bit of success. I draw the line at the 6, I would say to myself. Not because I loved the club, but that I should be able to hit the 6, right? It’s just a mental block, I’d rationalize. Easy-peasey. I should be able to hit the 6, as should any golfer worth his or her salt. But a human being, even a golfer, can only take so much suffering. Like Dennis being sent to sit in the corner, I banished my 6 to the garage, replacing it with a 26-degree hybrid of the same number, TaylorMade, same as my iron set.

Well, I can’t say this hybrid has been an absolute blessing, but I do hit it more solidly and more consistently than I ever did with the iron. Since I don’t practice enough as my body ages, my direction is often off, missing the green by only a few feet, but enough to make a fairly sure par, or sometimes turn a birdie into a bogey due to inconsistent chipping. Still, when I now pick up that 6-hybrid, I feel more confident that I’ll make pretty decent contact (and some of time, I do), and that little mental edge makes all the difference.

The main point of this discourse is that it’s OK to experiment with the clubs in your bag. Back in the early days, Bobby Jones used to build his set club by club. There was no such thing as a matched set. He and other players of his skill would experiment with clubs until they found ones with the right swing weight, length, and that intangible, right feel. Amazingly, when later tested, they were as true in relation to each other as today’s matched sets.

Now I’m not suggesting you do as Wee Bobby did. If Jones had the choices we have today, he would have had a set custom built from the same manufacturer, as we do, with one club fitted perfectly and others following suit. But once we get our properly fitted matched set, we can make choices as I described above according to which club feels or doesn’t feel right.

As I’ve said, we have relationships with the clubs in our bag. We love our driver, say. Not so much our 3-wood. We hate the 4-iron. And our wedges and putter? That’s almost another post in itself. Those scoring clubs are the closest we come to the days of Jones and Sarazen. This launches us into the precarious realm of leaving the security of the mother-set and into choosing wedges and putters from other manufacturers. And the TV ads tempt us this way and that until we wind up with clubs we often hate. Too heavy. Too light. Too much toe weight. Too little bounce. Too much bounce. Takes too big a divot. Or isn’t long enough. Doesn’t have the right alignment aids. Too many three-putts.

A few years ago I picked up a yellow-headed “Feel” 52-degree gap wedge from a friend for 10 bucks, and I struggled mightily with that club for months before realizing it was weighted like a splitting maul. Could never figure it out, and it scuttled a number of rounds. Finally, I splurged on TaylorMade wedges that more match my set and my wedge play has improved considerably. I’ve got three or four wedges in the garage currently doing time for inconsistency and insubordination. But even with my matched wedges, I’m still adding and subtracting clubs…like my Phil-inspired 64-degree Pinseeker that gets me out of bunkers like a cart girl in hot pants offering a cold beer.

So take inventory. See what’s working and what’s shirking. Make changes to your equipment accordingly. Hybrids are a blessing from the golf gods. Wedges are confusing, but resolve that 2016 will be the year you make the changes that need to be made. Don’t hesitate. The right equipment is out there. You just have to work at finding it.

Your Reaction?
  • 96
  • LEGIT12
  • WOW3
  • LOL3
  • IDHT1
  • FLOP3
  • OB0
  • SHANK35

Stephen has been a freelance writer since 1969. He's written six books, including the award-winning The Mindful Hiker and The Mindful Golfer, a best seller. His book covers all aspects of the game of golf, and can be purchased at local booksellers and online here. Stephen has also written many regional and national articles, and currently blogs at www.mindfulgolfer.com.

10 Comments

10 Comments

  1. Other Paul

    Apr 28, 2016 at 9:05 am

    I love phils 64 degree pin seeker as well. But i have it in A 56!

  2. Steve

    Apr 27, 2016 at 9:17 pm

    Ran out of things to try, so gave up my Callaway xhot irons (never liked the wide soles) bought some new Mizuno forged jpx-850, figured I would be working twice as hard to play them, wrong, even as a 14 handicap these irons are amazing very easy to control short irons and after a few buckets got the 5 and 6 up in the air and working fine…distance is almost the same…..love the feel and the thin top and bottom lines and less off set is great.

  3. DB

    Apr 27, 2016 at 8:22 pm

    I went through this cycle over the last couple of years, buying/trying/failing/selling…
    I’ve finally gotten my bag set up with what works for me in each category and I don’t see myself changing anything anytime soon. While trial and error can get expensive, I think I’m done for a while… I hope.
    On a similar note, anyone ever had a club that worked great for a long time and then all of the sudden you just can’t hit it anymore? Obviously a swing issue since the club didn’t change, but talk about frustrating and demoralizing!

  4. John Krug

    Apr 27, 2016 at 5:55 pm

    If you can’t hit a 6 iron or a 4 iron you need a lesson rather than buying a hybrid. Nothing like understanding the golf swing and having a proper one.

  5. Scooter McGavin

    Apr 27, 2016 at 5:46 pm

    Is that a Nickent 4DX driver in the photo? I miss the original Nickent clubs (before Dick’s bought them). Never should have sold my 3DX Hybrid irons…

  6. alfriday

    Apr 27, 2016 at 2:14 pm

    The following quote from the article is very telling:

    “I should be able to hit the 6, as should any golfer worth his or her salt. But a human being, even a golfer, can only take so much suffering. Like Dennis being sent to sit in the corner, I banished my 6 to the garage, replacing it with a 26-degree hybrid of the same number, TaylorMade, same as my iron set.”

    Most golfers should be able to hit a 6 iron. The problem is that Taylormade 6 irons are really 4 irons. The M2 has a 25 degree loft and 37.625 inch length. The Aeroburner 6 iron is 25.5 degrees and 37.63 inches. Even with the weight of the clubhead redistributed for a higher launch, the clubs are still too long.

    Remember the 24/38 rule? Most amateur golfers don’t have the swing speed or consistency to hit an iron longer than 38 inches or stronger than 24 degrees. No re-weighting of the clubbed changes the basic rule. The Taylormade irons are on the edge of that rule. Some will be able to hit it, some not. If the author bought a full set, then he purchase three irons he can’t hit–4, 5, and 6.

    Taylormade is not the only manufacturer to strengthen, and just as important, to lengthen clubs.

    Most amateur golfers wouldn’t feel bad about submitting a hybrid for a 4 iron. But stick a 6 on the bottom of the club and we fall into golfer’s angst.

  7. BIG STU

    Apr 26, 2016 at 7:35 pm

    Good and truthful article. I do not like hybrids but then again I still can hit and play long irons. I am a feel player and I have all my clubs weighted for my feel. I do build and tune my own clubs though. Wedges Good Lord! I am a wedge ho and I have probably close to 100 wedges everything from vintage to newer stuff. One just has to figure out what will work for them whether it is a hybrid or an odd ball iron that one can hit

  8. Greg V

    Apr 26, 2016 at 3:54 pm

    Sometimes you just can’t explain a club that doesn’t work – even when the ones around it do work. I suspect that all shafts are not created equal, even if they have the same shaft band as the next. Who knows if they twist and flex consistently under load. Life is too short; I will pick up another club, even breaking up an iron set to put the ones in my bag that work consistently.

    The trick is sticking with the ones that DO work!

  9. DJ

    Apr 26, 2016 at 11:42 am

    Agree completely. It’s about finding the club that has the best feel and gets the most out of it (distance, spin, trajectory). I got a Cobra driver, Callaway 3 wood, Adams hybrid, TM 4 iron, Bridgestone 5-9, Mizuno PW, TM 50 and 56, Titleist 62

  10. Brad

    Apr 26, 2016 at 11:10 am

    If there was ever a statement that accurately describes us WRXers, it’s this:

    “I’ve got three or four wedges in the garage currently doing time for inconsistency and insubordination. But even with my matched wedges, I’m still adding and subtracting clubs…like my Phil-inspired 64-degree Pinseeker that gets me out of bunkers like a cart girl in hot pants offering a cold beer.”

    Great article Stephen! Really enjoyed it.

Leave a Reply

Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

19th Hole

Vincenzi’s 2024 Zurich Classic of New Orleans betting preview

Published

on

The PGA TOUR heads to New Orleans to play the 2023 Zurich Classic of New Orleans. In a welcome change from the usual stroke play, the Zurich Classic is a team event. On Thursday and Saturday, the teams play best ball, and on Friday and Sunday the teams play alternate shot.

TPC Louisiana is a par 72 that measures 7,425 yards. The course features some short par 4s and plenty of water and bunkers, which makes for a lot of exciting risk/reward scenarios for competitors. Pete Dye designed the course in 2004 specifically for the Zurich Classic, although the event didn’t make its debut until 2007 because of Hurricane Katrina.

Coming off of the Masters and a signature event in consecutive weeks, the field this week is a step down, and understandably so. Many of the world’s top players will be using this time to rest after a busy stretch.

However, there are some interesting teams this season with some stars making surprise appearances in the team event. Some notable teams include Patrick Cantlay and Xander Schauffele, Rory McIlroy and Shane Lowry, Collin Morikawa and Kurt Kitayama, Will Zalatoris and Sahith Theegala as well as a few Canadian teams, Nick Taylor and Adam Hadwin and Taylor Pendrith and Corey Conners.

Past Winners at TPC Louisiana

  • 2023: Riley/Hardy (-30)
  • 2022: Cantlay/Schauffele (-29)
  • 2021: Leishman/Smith (-20)
  • 2019: Palmer/Rahm (-26)
  • 2018: Horschel/Piercy (-22)
  • 2017: Blixt/Smith (-27)

2024 Zurich Classic of New Orleans Picks

Tom Hoge/Maverick McNealy +2500 (DraftKings)

Tom Hoge is coming off of a solid T18 finish at the RBC Heritage and finished T13 at last year’s Zurich Classic alongside Harris English.

This season, Hoge is having one of his best years on Tour in terms of Strokes Gained: Approach. In his last 24 rounds, the only player to top him on the category is Scottie Scheffler. Hoge has been solid on Pete Dye designs, ranking 28th in the field over his past 36 rounds.

McNealy is also having a solid season. He’s finished T6 at the Waste Management Phoenix Open and T9 at the PLAYERS Championship. He recently started working with world renowned swing coach, Butch Harmon, and its seemingly paid dividends in 2024.

Keith Mitchell/Joel Dahmen +4000 (DraftKings)

Keith Mitchell is having a fantastic season, finishing in the top-20 of five of his past seven starts on Tour. Most recently, Mitchell finished T14 at the Valero Texas Open and gained a whopping 6.0 strokes off the tee. He finished 6th at last year’s Zurich Classic.

Joel Dahmen is having a resurgent year and has been dialed in with his irons. He also has a T11 finish at the PLAYERS Championship at TPC Sawgrass which is another Pete Dye track. With Mitchell’s length and Dahmen’s ability to put it close with his short irons, the Mitchell/Dahmen combination will be dangerous this week.

Taylor Moore/Matt NeSmith +6500 (DraftKings)

Taylor Moore has quickly developed into one of the more consistent players on Tour. He’s finished in the top-20 in three of his past four starts, including a very impressive showing at The Masters, finishing T20. He’s also finished T4 at this event in consecutive seasons alongside Matt NeSmith.

NeSmith isn’t having a great 2024, but has seemed to elevate his game in this format. He finished T26 at Pete Dye’s TPC Sawgrass, which gives the 30-year-old something to build off of. NeSmith is also a great putter on Bermudagrass, which could help elevate Moore’s ball striking prowess.

Your Reaction?
  • 6
  • LEGIT3
  • WOW1
  • LOL0
  • IDHT0
  • FLOP3
  • OB1
  • SHANK1

Continue Reading

19th Hole

Vincenzi’s 2024 LIV Adelaide betting preview: Cam Smith ready for big week down under

Published

on

After having four of the top twelve players on the leaderboard at The Masters, LIV Golf is set for their fifth event of the season: LIV Adelaide. 

For both LIV fans and golf fans in Australia, LIV Adelaide is one of the most anticipated events of the year. With 35,000 people expected to attend each day of the tournament, the Grange Golf Club will be crawling with fans who are passionate about the sport of golf. The 12th hole, better known as “the watering hole”, is sure to have the rowdiest of the fans cheering after a long day of drinking some Leishman Lager.  

The Grange Golf Club is a par-72 that measures 6,946 yards. The course features minimal resistance, as golfers went extremely low last season. In 2023, Talor Gooch shot consecutive rounds of 62 on Thursday and Friday, giving himself a gigantic cushion heading into championship Sunday. Things got tight for a while, but in the end, the Oklahoma State product was able to hold off The Crushers’ Anirban Lahiri for a three-shot victory. 

The Four Aces won the team competition with the Range Goats finishing second. 

*All Images Courtesy of LIV Golf*

Past Winners at LIV Adelaide

  • 2023: Talor Gooch (-19)

Stat Leaders Through LIV Miami

Green in Regulation

  1. Richard Bland
  2. Jon Rahm
  3. Paul Casey

Fairways Hit

  1. Abraham Ancer
  2. Graeme McDowell
  3. Henrik Stenson

Driving Distance

  1. Bryson DeChambeau
  2. Joaquin Niemann
  3. Dean Burmester

Putting

  1. Cameron Smith
  2. Louis Oosthuizen
  3. Matt Jones

2024 LIV Adelaide Picks

Cameron Smith +1400 (DraftKings)

When I pulled up the odds for LIV Adelaide, I was more than a little surprised to see multiple golfers listed ahead of Cameron Smith on the betting board. A few starts ago, Cam finished runner-up at LIV Hong Kong, which is a golf course that absolutely suits his eye. Augusta National in another course that Smith could roll out of bed and finish in the top-ten at, and he did so two weeks ago at The Masters, finishing T6.

At Augusta, he gained strokes on the field on approach, off the tee (slightly), and of course, around the green and putting. Smith able to get in the mix at a major championship despite coming into the week feeling under the weather tells me that his game is once again rounding into form.

The Grange Golf Club is another course that undoubtedly suits the Australian. Smith is obviously incredibly comfortable playing in front of the Aussie faithful and has won three Australian PGA Championship’s. The course is very short and will allow Smith to play conservative off the tee, mitigating his most glaring weakness. With birdies available all over the golf course, there’s a chance the event turns into a putting contest, and there’s no one on the planet I’d rather have in one of those than Cam Smith.

Louis Oosthuizen +2200 (DraftKings)

Louis Oosthuizen has simply been one of the best players on LIV in the 2024 seas0n. The South African has finished in the top-10 on the LIV leaderboard in three of his five starts, with his best coming in Jeddah, where he finished T2. Perhaps more impressively, Oosthuizen finished T7 at LIV Miami, which took place at Doral’s “Blue Monster”, an absolutely massive golf course. Given that Louis is on the shorter side in terms of distance off the tee, his ability to play well in Miami shows how dialed he is with the irons this season.

In addition to the LIV finishes, Oosthuizen won back-to-back starts on the DP World Tour in December at the Alfred Dunhill Championship and the Mauritus Open. He also finished runner-up at the end of February in the International Series Oman. The 41-year-old has been one of the most consistent performers of 2024, regardless of tour.

For the season, Louis ranks 4th on LIV in birdies made, T9 in fairways hit and first in putting. He ranks 32nd in driving distance, but that won’t be an issue at this short course. Last season, he finished T11 at the event, but was in decent position going into the final round but fell back after shooting 70 while the rest of the field went low. This season, Oosthuizen comes into the event in peak form, and the course should be a perfect fit for his smooth swing and hot putter this week.

Your Reaction?
  • 12
  • LEGIT3
  • WOW0
  • LOL1
  • IDHT0
  • FLOP1
  • OB1
  • SHANK1

Continue Reading

Opinion & Analysis

The Wedge Guy: What really makes a wedge work? Part 1

Published

on

Of all the clubs in our bags, wedges are almost always the simplest in construction and, therefore, the easiest to analyze what might make one work differently from another if you know what to look for.

Wedges are a lot less mysterious than drivers, of course, as the major brands are working with a lot of “pixie dust” inside these modern marvels. That’s carrying over more to irons now, with so many new models featuring internal multi-material technologies, and almost all of them having a “badge” or insert in the back to allow more complex graphics while hiding the actual distribution of mass.

But when it comes to wedges, most on the market today are still single pieces of molded steel, either cast or forged into that shape. So, if you look closely at where the mass is distributed, it’s pretty clear how that wedge is going to perform.

To start, because of their wider soles, the majority of the mass of almost any wedge is along the bottom third of the clubhead. So, the best wedge shots are always those hit between the 2nd and 5th grooves so that more mass is directly behind that impact. Elite tour professionals practice incessantly to learn to do that consistently, wearing out a spot about the size of a penny right there. If impact moves higher than that, the face is dramatically thinner, so smash factor is compromised significantly, which reduces the overall distance the ball will fly.

Every one of us, tour players included, knows that maddening shot that we feel a bit high on the face and it doesn’t go anywhere, it’s not your fault.

If your wedges show a wear pattern the size of a silver dollar, and centered above the 3rd or 4th groove, you are not getting anywhere near the same performance from shot to shot. Robot testing proves impact even two to three grooves higher in the face can cause distance loss of up to 35 to 55 feet with modern ‘tour design’ wedges.

In addition, as impact moves above the center of mass, the golf club principle of gear effect causes the ball to fly higher with less spin. Think of modern drivers for a minute. The “holy grail” of driving is high launch and low spin, and the driver engineers are pulling out all stops to get the mass as low in the clubhead as possible to optimize this combination.

Where is all the mass in your wedges? Low. So, disregarding the higher lofts, wedges “want” to launch the ball high with low spin – exactly the opposite of what good wedge play requires penetrating ball flight with high spin.

While almost all major brand wedges have begun putting a tiny bit more thickness in the top portion of the clubhead, conventional and modern ‘tour design’ wedges perform pretty much like they always have. Elite players learn to hit those crisp, spinny penetrating wedge shots by spending lots of practice time learning to consistently make contact low in the face.

So, what about grooves and face texture?

Grooves on any club can only do so much, and no one has any material advantage here. The USGA tightly defines what we manufacturers can do with grooves and face texture, and modern manufacturing techniques allow all of us to push those limits ever closer. And we all do. End of story.

Then there’s the topic of bounce and grinds, the most complex and confusing part of the wedge formula. Many top brands offer a complex array of sole configurations, all of them admittedly specialized to a particular kind of lie or turf conditions, and/or a particular divot pattern.

But if you don’t play the same turf all the time, and make the same size divot on every swing, how would you ever figure this out?

The only way is to take any wedge you are considering and play it a few rounds, hitting all the shots you face and observing the results. There’s simply no other way.

So, hopefully this will inspire a lively conversation in our comments section, and I’ll chime in to answer any questions you might have.

And next week, I’ll dive into the rest of the wedge formula. Yes, shafts, grips and specifications are essential, too.

Your Reaction?
  • 32
  • LEGIT7
  • WOW1
  • LOL1
  • IDHT2
  • FLOP3
  • OB1
  • SHANK3

Continue Reading

WITB

Facebook

Trending