Connect with us

Putter Reviews

Zen Oracle RDE Mallet Review

Published

on

The idea is simple – play with the same putter you practice with.

By practice, I’m not referring to hitting putt after putt on the practice green with your putter. What I mean is a product that provides you with an array of drills you can use every day to help you become a better putter. On top of that, without any other modifications you can take the exact same putter from practice into a competitive round. Zen Oracle has combined these two facets into a single product before and their newest introduction – the RDE Mallet is a major step forward for the company, not only in terms of technology but also overall fit and finish. Chances are very good you’ve seen a Zen Oracle putter before and not even known it. Stuart Appleby is one of many tour pros who use Zen Putters. The cult favorite “Cameron Cube” from Scotty Cameron was created with Zen Oracle technology. So just how does the newest Zen Oracle offering rate? Read on to find out.

Technology

GolfWRX recently interviewed Nick Middleton inventor and Founder of Zen Oracle and Bob Hanington, CEO of Zen Oracle USA. The depth of information they have provided us there is truly incredible, and while I will do my best to relay their information, the interview is well worth reading to capture the full scope of their research and technical innovation.

One look at the RDE Mallet reveals the main secret to Zen Oracle’s success, the aperture which has several functions. First and foremost, the aperture is the key to the Zen Oracle Training System. Placing a ball in the aperture and practicing the putting stroke allows golfers to work on their ability to release the putter through impact and produce a smooth putting stroke. Once in play, it provides a very effective alignment system. Since the aperture is roughly the width of a golf ball, it makes alignment a snap. Furthermore, the opening also functions to move mass toward the heel, toe and rear of the putter making it very forgiving and increasing its MOI.

While the aperture is at the heart of the RDE mallet, it is far from the only piece of technology. The face of all of Zen’s new putters have the Reduced Dimple Error (RDE) system which is a series of horizontal micro-ridges milled into the face of the putter. These RDE ridges help to counteract the changes in golf ball technology which have improved performance from tee to green but reduced accuracy and feel off the putter. At impact, the micro-ridges reduce the surface area in contact between teh putter face and ball. The result of this is tighter initial dispersion and overall a more accurate roll on all lengths of putts.

It would be remiss to talk about Zen Oracle and not discuss their views on fitting. The RDE Mallet has a unique feature of an interchangeable hosel used by heralded golf club designer Mickey Parker. With this feature, golfers can choose the style of neck they prefer to achieve the correct amount of face balancing, offset, and toe flow they prefer. Yet it does not stop there. Fitting is a major consideration for the folks at Zen. Their goal is to build a putter that is completely adaptable to whatever the end user needs to fit their personal stroke the best. Even the grip used on the Zen Oracle has been specifically designed with fitting and repeatability in mind. Nick Middleton explains:

On the putter, on the actual grip, we’ll have a position we use to measure from the thumb print, down to the floor, and back to the eye. Once you’ve got that, and once you understand how to use our training and what we understand about the actual movement and the motion pattern in the putting stroke, it means that every time you use that putting stroke, all you have to do is put your thumb on that same place on the shaft, address the ball in the same way that we asked you in the protocol to measure the putter. Every time you do that, it will enable you to bring the putter to square over a larger range of scenarios.

Training

Zen Oracle’s mantra is finding one putter that does everything.  From fitting to playing and practicing their goal is producing a putter that encompasses everything a golfer needs in a single package. Arguably, the most novel invention of the Zen Oracle putters is being able to use the same putter to practice and play with. The aperture in the Oracle allows for many unique drills that can help golfers learn to correct mechanical faults that lead to poor putting. They provide immediate feedback on mechanics and how to address any issues your putting stroke may have.

The Release drill is probably the most basic.  A golf ball is placed in the aperture and then using the basic putting stroke, the golfer can roll the ball down the target line. Ideally, this drill helps promote a putting stroke that is based with movement of the shoulders and a smooth putting stroke. Any inconsistencies in release will cause the ball to either veer off line or remain in the aperture.

At first I was skeptical about how effective this training method would be for me. I have spent quite a bit of time changing my putting stroke in line with Stan Utley’s belief of rotation around the spine rather than up and down. However, when I tried training with the putter in this method, I was pleasantly surprised that the Zen Oracle still had quite a bit to offer me. Using the reflex drill helped me keep the putter head low to the ground on the back swing, especially on long putts. Any extreme lifting of the putter head up would cause the ball to come out of the aperture too early. Also, I was still able to release the ball from the aperture using the low, short follow through that Stan Utley recommends.

It doesn’t just stop with the release drill, there is also Reflex, Tracker, and Tracer, all of which can be viewed on Zen Oracle’s website. Regardless of exactly how you putt, whether it is straight back and straight through, gated, arced, even a cut across it Billy Mayfair style Zen Oracle has a drill that will help you become a more consistent putter. Enough time and experimentation and it’s likely you will be able to find your own drill using the putter that can help you.

Aesthetics

The technology of Zen Oracle is hard to dispute. In the past they have done their research and have the results to prove it at the highest levels of competitive golf. However, previous iterations of the putter left something to be desired in terms of visuals. That has all changed with the new RDE line. The entire putter is milled from 303 stainless steel and cleanly assembled into an aesthetically pleasing package. Although the hosel can accommodate several different neck styles, they all blend seamlessly into the body of the putter and you would be hard pressed to know that each neck isn’t made specifically for each putter. Considering some of the forms mallet putters have recently been taking, the RDE mallet is fairly conservatively designed. The thin top line of the blade is cleanly attached to the body of the mallet which houses the aperture. A single sight line at the back of the aperture aids in alignment. In addition, the designers have placed a tremendous importance on proper feel and sound, that will be described shortly.

Performance

The RDE Mallet truly shines when it’s actually put into play. The overall feel and sound combine with excellent performance and make it a very capable putter. The ridges milled onto the face do seem to help get the ball rolling quickly. Although the putter is made from stainless steel and has a large opening right in the middle, it does not have a hollow, tinny feel you might expect from typical MOI mallet putters. Quite the contrary, it has a very soft, solid sound and feel one might expect from a more traditional blade style putter. Furthermore, the choice of head weight for all models between 345-350 grams is a perfect choice to provide feel short range as well as good distance control on longer putts. The alignment the aperture provides makes squaring the putter face up on putts incredibly easy and will make the transition very easy for players used to putters like the Odyssey Two Ball.

Since the putter has no insert, distance control is very easy on long putts, and the high MOI ensures that both heel and toe misses are not heavily penalized in terms of distance although direction did suffer as one would expect. However, this forgiveness comes at a price in the form of lack of feedback. My only real qualm with the putter is forgiving enough that putts missed even a large amount from the center did not provide the feedback I was used to from my Anser style putter. Combined with an uber-soft Winn grip, much of the negative vibrations off center hits usually produce end up being tuned out. However, that is a small price to pay for a putter that is as forgiving as the RDE Mallet.

Overview

Based purely on performance alone, the RDE Mallet provides a very capable putter that combines clean visuals, soft feel, easy alignment, and impressive forgiveness into a single package. Add in the fact that users can decide the neck style and face balancing that fits their stroke the best and you have a putter that separates itself from any other on the market. However, considering the number of putting drills and training methods the putter also incorporates, it not only provides a solid putter even the most traditional purists could accept but also provides a way for golfers to improve their putting.

Your Reaction?
  • 9
  • LEGIT1
  • WOW2
  • LOL0
  • IDHT0
  • FLOP0
  • OB0
  • SHANK0

3 Comments

3 Comments

  1. alan

    Dec 2, 2013 at 10:39 am

    I use a Zen Oracle putter and am very happy with the weight, feel and touch however I’d like to purchase a zen head cover.
    Cheers
    Aaln

  2. Andrew Linch

    Nov 15, 2009 at 5:03 am

    Tried all the new putters and i do mean all and this one was head and shoulders above the rest, and the training aid side of the putter is a Bonus 2 for the price of 1, so in short bought one and am very happy with it.

  3. D.Power

    Mar 15, 2008 at 10:45 am

    all very interesting. How can I decide what face balanacing, weight,and neck style would suit me? I live in Waterford Ireland.Will they be stocked here?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Equipment

Blade vs. mallet: What style putters do the top-50 players in the world use? (2022 update)

Published

on

Four years ago, I wrote an article where I analyzed the putters that the top-50 players in the world were using, and the top-50 players in strokes gained: putting. I wanted to find out whether more mallet-style putters, or blade-style putters, were being used by the world’s best.

In 2018, I found that 44 percent of the top-50 players in the Official World Golf Rankings were using mallet style putters, and 56 percent of the top-50 in strokes gained: putting were using mallet putters.

Flash forward to 2022, and it would seem that more and more top golfers are switching into mallet putters – Scottie Scheffler, for example, just switched into a mallet putter after using a blade-style putter throughout his career.

What are the actual numbers, though? Are more top PGA Tour players really using mallet putters these days, or is the shift overblown?

I wanted to find out.

For my research, I simply went through the most recent GolfWRX WITB photos, and the most recent photos on Getty Images, to figure out what style putter each player in the Top-50 in the OWGR is using, as well as each Top-50 player in strokes gained: putting on the PGA Tour for the 2021-22 season.

Below are the results:

Top-50 in OWGR: Blade or Mallet?

Mallet putter users, 62 percent (31 out of 50)

Rory McIlroy’s TaylorMade Spider Tour mallet putter

Rory McIlroy (No. 1: TaylorMade Spider Tour Hydroblast)

Scottie Scheffler (No. 2: Scotty Cameron T-5.5 Proto)

Patrick Cantlay (No. 4: Scotty Cameron T5 Proto)

Jon Rahm (N0. 5: Odyssey Rossie S White Hot OG)

Xander Schauffele (No. 6: Odyssey O-Works #7 CH Red)

Will Zalatoris (No. 7: Scotty Cameron Circle T Phantom X T-11 Proto)

Justin Thomas (No. 8: Scotty Cameron T5 Proto Tour-Only custom)

Viktor Hovland (No. 11: Ping PLD DS 72)

Sam Burns (No. 12: Odyssey O-Works 7S)

Billy Horschel (No. 16: Ping PLD Sigma 2 Tyne 4)

Cameron Young (No. 17: Scotty Cameron T5 prototype)

Max Homa (No. 18: Scotty Cameron Phantom X T5.5 Prototype)

Sungjae Im (No. 20: Scotty Cameron Flowback 5 Prototype)

Shane Lowry: (No. 21: Odyssey DFX 2-ball)

Abraham Ancer (No. 23: Odyssey White Hot No. 5 Stroke Lab)

Keegan Bradley (No. 25: Odyssey Versa Jailbird)

Sepp Straka (No. 27: Odyssey Tuttle Stroke Lab)

Tyrrell Hatton (No. 28: Ping Vault Oslo)

Kevin Kisner (No. 29: Odyssey 2-Ball 11)

Dustin Johnson (No. 30: TaylorMade Spider GT Black)

Corey Conners (No. 31: Ping PLD Prototype)

Tom Hoge (No. 32: TaylorMade Spider X Hydroblast)

K.H. Lee (No. 33: Odyssey Works Versa 2-ball)

Adam Scott (No. 34: L.A.B. Golf Mezz.1 prototype)

Aaron Wise (No. 36: TaylorMade Ghost)

Brian Harman (No. 37: TaylorMade OS CB)

Daniel Berger (No. 43: TaylorMade Spider X Hydroblast)

Jason Kokrak (No. 44: Bettinardi Studio Stock 38)

Harold Varner III (No. 46: Odyssey White Hot OG 7S)

Seamus Power (No. 48: Ping PLD3 Mallet)

Harris English (No. 49: Ping Scottsdale Hohum)

Blade putter users, 38 percent (19 out of 50)

Tom Kim’s new custom Scotty Cameron blade-style putter

Cameron Smith (No. 3: Scotty Cameron 009M Prototype)

Collin Morikawa (No. 9: TaylorMade TP Soto)

Matt Fitzpatrick (No. 10: Bettinardi DASS Prototype)

Jordan Spieth (No. 13: Scotty Cameron 009 tour prototype)

Tony Finau (No. 14: Ping PLD Prototype)

Joohyung “Tom” Kim (No. 15: Scotty Cameron TourType GSS Prototype)

Hideki Matsuyama (No. 19: Scotty Cameron Newport 2 GSS)

Joaquin Niemann (No. 22: Prototype Ping PLD Anser)

Tommy Fleetwood (No. 24: TaylorMade TP Juno)

Ryan Fox (No. 26: Ping Anser 2D)

Thomas Pieters (No. 35: Scotty Cameron Squareback Select 2 Tour Only)

Talor Gooch (No. 38: Odyssey Tri-Hot Two)

Brooks Koepka (No. 39: Scotty Cameron Teryllium TNP2)

Kevin Na (No. 40: Odyssey Toulon Madison)

Kurt Kitayama (No. 41: Scotty Cameron Newport prototype)

Louis Oosthuizen (No. 42: Ping Vault 2.0 Voss)

Mito Pereira (No. 45: Ping Vault 2.0 Dale Anser Stealth)

Paul Casey (No. 47: Scotty Cameron 009M Prototype)

Alex Noren (No. 50: Odyssey O-Works 1W)

Top-50 in Strokes Gained: Putting

Mallet users: 70 percent (35 of 50 players)

Kelly Kraft’s custom Odyssey Versa 1-Ball Red prototype mallet

Lucas Herbert (No. 1: TaylorMade Spider X Hydroblast)

Denny McCarthy (No. 2: Scotty Cameron GoLo N7)

Tyrrell Hatton (No. 4: Ping Vault Oslo)

Beau Hossler (No. 5: Odyssey 2-Ball Ten)

Christiaan Bezuidenhout (No. 6: Odyssey White Hot OG #7)

Kelly Kraft (No. 7: Odyssey Versa 1-ball Red Prototype)

Kevin Kisner (No. 9: Odyssey 2-ball 11)

Sam Burns (No. 10: Odyssey O-Works 7S)

Martin Trainer (No. 12: Scotty Cameron Circle T Prototype Phantom T12)

Chesson Hadley (No. 13: Odyssey White Hot OG 2-Ball)

Mackenzie Hughes (No. 14: Ping Scottsdale TR Piper C)

Rory McIlroy (No. 16: TaylorMade Spider Tour Hydroblast)

Ian Poulter (No. 17: Scotty Cameron T-11 Proto)

Justin Rose (No. 20: Axis1 Rose Prototype)

Billy Horschel (No. 21: Ping PLD Sigma 2 Tyne 4)

Matthew Wolff (No. 23: TaylorMade GT Notchback)

Adam Long (No. 24: Scotty Cameron T5 Proto)

Viktor Hovland (No. 25: Ping PLD DS 72)

Max Homa (No. 27: Scotty Cameron Phantom X T5.5 Prototype)

Patrick Cantlay (T28: Scotty Cameron T5 Proto)

Jon Rahm (T28: Odyssey Rossie S White Hot OG)

Wyndham Clark (No. 31: Scotty Cameron T5 Proto)

Xander Schauffele (No. 32: Odyssey O-Works #7 CH Red)

Vince Whaley (No. 33: Odyssey White Hot OG #7)

Rory Sabbatini (No. 34: Scotty Cameron Flowback Prototype)

Austin Cook (T35: Ping Sigma G Tyne)

Sungjae Im (No. 37: Scotty Cameron Flowback 5 Prototype)

Andrew Putnam (No. 38: Odyssey Stroke Lab Black Rossie)

Sepp Straka (No. 39: Odyssey Tuttle Stroke Lab)

Seamus Power (No. 40: Ping PLD3 Mallet)

J.T. Poston (T41: Scotty Cameron GoLo 5 Black Tour Prototype)

Adam Scott (T41: L.A.B. Golf Mezz.1 prototype)

Troy Merritt (No. 43: Yes! C-Groove Mollie Tour)

Jason Kokrak (T46: Bettinardi Studio Stock 38)

Mark Hubbard (No. 50: Odyssey Metal X Milled #9HT)

Blade users: 30 percent (15 of 50)

Matthew Fitzpatrick’s custom Bettinardi blade-style putter

Brendon Todd (No. 3: Sik Pro C-Series)

Cameron Smith (No. 8: Scotty Cameron 009M Prototype)

Matt Kuchar (No. 11: Bettinardi Tour Department SS28 DASS)

Marc Leishman (No. 15: Odyssey Versa #6)

Alex Noren (No. 18: Odyssey O-Works 1W)

Maverick McNealy (No. 19: Toulon Stanford MM Custom)

Matt Fitzpatrick (No. 22: Bettinardi DASS Prototype)

Tommy Fleetwood (No. 26: TaylorMade TP Juno)

Patrick Rodgers (No. 30: Odyssey Toulon San Diego)

Seung-Yul Noh (T35: Scotty Cameron Select Prototype)

Scott Stallings (No. 44: Scotty Cameron Newport 2.6 Prototype)

Brooks Koepka (No. 45: Scotty Cameron Teryllium TNP2)

Justin Lower (T46: PXG Prototype)

Richy Werenski (No. 48: Scotty Cameron Circle T Prototype)

Patrick Reed (No. 49: Odyssey White Hot Pro #3)

Conclusion

In 2018, 44 percent of the top-50 players in the Official World Golf Rankings were using mallet style putters, and 56 percent of the top-50 in strokes gained: putting were using mallet putters.

In 2022, 62 percent of the top-50 players in the OWGR use mallet style putters, and 70 percent of the top-50 in strokes gained: putting were using mallet style putters.

What do you think this means?

To me, it means that each golfer should try as many putters as possible – under the supervision of a professional fitter or local club professional – and find the best possible putter to fit their stroke style and preferences.

Your Reaction?
  • 184
  • LEGIT41
  • WOW14
  • LOL5
  • IDHT4
  • FLOP2
  • OB1
  • SHANK13

Continue Reading

Putter Reviews

REVIEW: Ping’s new PLD (Putting Lab Design) putters for 2022

Published

on

Not every golfer has access to custom-built golf putters like PGA Tour players do, but with Ping’s new PLD (Putting Lab Design) program, they can get pretty darn close.

Through the newly launched website, pingpld.com, golfers will have access to precision milled putters like the ones seen on Tour, and they can even customize their own putter with a Tour-level fitting experience either online or in person.

There’s three essential levels to the new PLD program: PLD Custom, PLD Limited and PLD Milled. Each of the levels comes with different putter options at differing price points.

“The PLD program allows us to bring golfers more of what we do best – design and build the highest-performing custom putters in the game,” said Ping President John K. Solheim, in a press release. “It offers nearly endless possibilities. Golfers can craft their own custom design through PLD Custom, choose the proven performance of a PLD Milled model or add to their putter collection by acquiring a PLD Limited. It gives golfers a chance to play what the pros play and own a piece of Ping history.”

“We established the PLD name several years ago as an extension of the PING Putting Lab,
where we’ve been fitting some of the top players in the world for more than 20 years,” said
Solheim. “Until now, access to the master fitters who deliver these custom putter experiences has been limited to the best players in the game. We can now bring golfers what they’ve been asking for either through a virtual or in-person experience.”

Below, we go further in-depth on each of the three options within the PLD program.

Ping PLD Milled

PGA Tour players such as Viktor Hovland, Tony Finau and Bubba Watson use Ping PLD precision milled putters, and now consumers will have access to those Tour-proven putters.

Each of the heads (Anser, Anser 2, DS72 and Prime Tyne 4) are machine milled from forged 303 stainless steel. Ping offers a breakdown of the specs for each available model, which will sell for $485 each:

Anser

Slight Arc
350g
Matte Black finish
Ping black graphite shaft
Lie Angle: 20° +/- 4°
Loft: 3° +3°/- 2°

Anser 2

Slight Arc
350g
Satin finish
Chrome stepless steel shaft
Lie Angle: 20° +/- 4°
Loft: 3° +3°/- 2°

DS72

Straight Stroke
365g
Satin finish
Chrome stepless steel shaft
Lie Angle: 20° +/- 2°
Loft: 3° +3°/- 2°

Prime Tyne 4

Aerospace grade, machined aluminum hosel
Strong Arc
360g
Matte Black finish
Matte-black stepless steel shaft
Lie Angle: 20° +/- 4°
Loft: 3° +3°/- 2°

“The PLD Milled is an exciting addition to our putter line,” said John K. Solheim. “We’ve
identified a couple of our most popular models from the past and some newer designs that have attracted a lot of attention in the last couple of years. We’ve given the new putters a very clean, premium look to emphasize the precision process they undergo before they are ready for play. As we collaborate on new designs with our engineers and tour staff through the PLD program, we’ll add new models to bring golfers the latest in tour-proven performance on the putting green.”

Ping PLD Limited

Ping’s PLD Limited will feature periodic limited-edition releases consisting of either putters that are played on Tour, or iconic designs from history. According to Ping, these putters are mostly targeted toward collectors, so they will have serialized numbers and will not be available for custom modifications.

For its first release ($790), Ping developed a 2022 version of the original Ping Anser, celebrating the 55th Anniversary of receiving the original Anser Patent on March 21, 1967.

“A lot of time has passed since the invention of the Anser putter,” said John A. Solheim, Ping’s Chairman & CEO and the youngest son of Karsten Solheim, who designed the original putter. “We think it’s important to remind the golf industry and some of the younger golfers that the iconic design they see with other brands’ name on it was created by Karsten in his garage in the mid-1960s. I was fortunate to be at his side building the first Ansers, and continued to do so for many years. It’s time Karsten gets the credit he deserves for inventing the Anser putter.”

Ping PLD Custom

The highest level in the Ping PLD program feature the PLD Custom putters, where golfers can customize their own designs with either the help of a Ping Master fitter in person, or virtually through the PLD program online. To help golfers find their perfect putter, they will use the PLD iPing putting app, and a Ping Master fitter will analyze the player’s data to recommend a putter.

Then, golfers can fully customize the putter to their liking, with ability to change head model, Tungsten weighting, face milling, finish, alignment aids, stampings and paint fill. Ping’s Master Fitters will also help golfers get the correct length, lie angle and loft for their stroke and biometrics.

The putters themselves will sell for $1,290, and a $200 non-refundable payment is required to schedule and participate in a PLD Custom Fitting, whether it’s virtually or in person.

Personally, I received a Ping PLD Custom Fitting in-person at the company’s indoor facility in Phoenix, Arizona. After identifying my stroke flaws (of which there many) using Ping’s iPing putting app, I tried out a slew of different head options and we made head adjustments along the way to figure out what truly works. Here were my final specs:

Head model: Ping Anser
Finish: Patina
Weight: 350 grams
Alignment line/dot: None
Stamping: “T” on the hosel
Length: 35.5 inches
Shaft: Chrome Stepless Steel
Grip: PP58 Black Midsize

What blew me away most was how impactful length and lie angle can be on comfort at address and stroke pattern. Even minor changes felt drastic. Also, the depth of face milling can truly change both feel and sound; I never realized how much.

Another point of note: Switching up alignment lines obviously can affect aim, but for me, they also influenced my stroke itself due to the visual changes. I highly suggest going through a full putter fitting to determine what specifications you prefer for yourself.

Check out the photos below of the putter that was designed for me through my work with a Ping Master Fitter:

Ping PLD putters are available for pre-order today, and head over to Ping’s PLD website to book your own fitting here.

Your Reaction?
  • 126
  • LEGIT12
  • WOW15
  • LOL4
  • IDHT3
  • FLOP1
  • OB0
  • SHANK10

Continue Reading

Putter Reviews

WRX Spotlight Review: T Squared TS-713i Standard Series putter

Published

on

Product:  T Squared TS-713i Standard Series Putter

About T Squared: T Squared Putters is a small putter manufacturer just south of Buffalo, New York. The company was founded by Tony Tuber who created his first prototype putters, after hours, in his father’s machine shop. Since then Tony and his father have been creating high-quality putters in the same facility that creates high precision instruments for the medical field. They pride themselves on creating the highest quality, most precise putter they can offer. They offer a few different head shapes from small traditional blades to high MOI mallets and even a custom program to get exactly what you want.

The Ts-713i Standard Series is based on the Ts-713, the first prototype that Tony created. It is a blade-style putter with a slightly longer flange and a unique face insert milled from 6061 aluminum. The body of the Ts713i is milled from a solid block of 303 stainless steel that is produced in the USA and has a Teflon backing between the body and face insert.

This Teflon backing helps give the putter a softer feel at impact and reduce any unwanted vibration. Details are what T Squared is all about and the neck of the putter shows off their milling expertise. The neck is similar to a plumbers neck, built with multiple pieces and offering some cool texture on the section bonded to the head. Another great detail is that all the silver markings on the putter are not filled with paint, they are milled into the head. T Squared finished the head in a sharp matte black and then milled all the markings on the putter for a unique, shiny silver look that really stands out. Ts-713i putters are built for customizing and have a ton of options that you can select if you would like to build something totally unique

On the green, the T Squared TS-713i really performs fantastic. I found the feel at impact very solid without any unwanted vibration. The impact produces a muted click and soft feel that I wasn’t expecting from this aluminum insert and thin face. The deep milling and Teflon coated back to the insert really work together to produce a great, responsive feel that I enjoyed. Deep milling usually makes me a little worried because it can soften the putter too much and lose that feel we all demand.

The TS-713i has no issues and transmits impact feel back to your hands with ease. Mishits are a little louder and harsh, but nothing even close to unpleasant. I have used putters that don’t feel as good on perfectly struck shots as the TS-713i feels on mishit putts. Distance and accuracy on those mishit putts are not as drastic as you would expect with a blade putter. I often just missed the cup by small margins when I struck a putt on the toe or heel of the TS-713i. There aren’t too many blade putters that have shown this level of forgiveness on the green for me.

The “T” alignment aid on the flange of the putter is large and easy to use. Not only do you get a straight line from the face to the back edge for alignment, but the back of the “T” also helps you square the putter up to your target. The Pure grip is not my thing, and it would be great for T Squared to offer a few more options, but that is an easy fix and a very minor criticism.

Overall, the T Squared TS-713i is a great putter from young Tony Tuber that exceeded my expectations. His attention to detail, precision milling, and take on a classic head shape offer golfers something different without sacrificing any performance. If you are looking for a great feeling putter that is made in the USA, you should take a look at T Squared and see what they can make for you.

Your Reaction?
  • 61
  • LEGIT15
  • WOW6
  • LOL2
  • IDHT2
  • FLOP5
  • OB0
  • SHANK6

Continue Reading

WITB

Facebook

Trending