by Johnny

FROM Taylormade:
Our Longer is Longer
Engineered for extreme distance and pinpoint accuracy. Inspired by metal-wood construction. Fast-flexing faces and innovative Toe-Bar technology for exceptional feel and sound.

Click here to see more photos and read the discussion in the forums

6-AW are smaller then I expected
4-5 are very hybrid/driving iron-like.
9-AW really setup the sweetest on the set.
Sound and thus Feel where a pleasant surprise.

Long irons have huge offset and very thick top line.
Thick but acceptable topline in other irons.
Was not as pleased with feel of 4-5 irons, rest of set felt better.

The new RocketBallz irons represent the latest technology in game improvement irons. They are designed to give the player maximum ballspeed and pinpoint accuracy. I think they are ideally suited for that mid to high handicapper that struggles to get the ball in the air and who also has difficulty hitting the longer irons.

I must state it has been years since I played a round with some serious game improvement irons. I’m coming from the background of playing forged irons and mostly blades the last dozen or so years plus. Having said that, yes visually the RBZ were quite an adjustment, but I will try to come from the GI iron perspective for the review. I’ve been working on this review for a few days now and I got a chance to reshaft a couple irons to see if there is any improvement in my initial opinions. So comments in () will be new based on reshafting the 4Iron with a DGS400 and the 7iron with a Aerotech Steelfiber i95.

Click here to see more photos and read the discussion in the forums

I feel better if I break this up into different sets, starting with the 4 and 5 irons. They are rather big in appearance with lots of offset and a huge topline. Even by GI standards probably not the best looking heads, but I do realize a 2 piece metalwood construction can only look so good. I wish the 5 would have been the same design as the 6i and up.

Now on to the 6-7-8 irons… I would almost describe these are undercut/pocket type cavity irons. The Heel to toe dimension is shorter than most GI irons which I take as a big positive and make the head seem “compact” despite the semi-thick topline. Now the 9, PW and AW are not all that different from the 6-7-8, but maybe the added loft makes the topline appear thinner.

The believe Taylormade was very smart in giving this head a dark finish, not only do the irons look cool, but I think it make the irons look compact at address not to mention easy to frame the ball in the hitting area of the face.

Click here to see more photos and read the discussion in the forums

The Turf: I didn’t hit too many fairways with my first round and that might have been a good thing too. I was surprised how good these irons where from the intermediate and heavier rough. I actually had more success in the rough then I did when I was in the fairway. I tend to be a picker / sweeper of the ball in general, so I did try to take some heavier divots dropping a second ball in the fairway and it worked a little better with that motion. Knockdowns are very playable with these irons as well which is a bonus since I play in a very windy area.

Direction: The irons want to go straight. I did manage to fade them consistently, but could not turn the ball over to consistently get a high draw that was advertised. I might have been compensating a little in my swing knowing how much more offset these had then what I am used too. I like to work a fade most of the time into greens so that is fine by me. Overall very straight hitting irons, especially 7-AW which were extremely straight for me.

Forgiveness: Looking at where I was hitting the ball on the face, I think I was pretty much staying in the center, so I cannot comment on heel and toe hits. As for low and high the irons seemed very forgiving to me. I think this is the inverted cone technology coming into play. Sure hitting them a little thin gave me lower ballflight, but distance and direction were still good. (Today for whatever reason is was slightly off to the heel side of the face, which is my common miss. I got the expected fade with that impact area, but a little less so then with my gamer forged irons.)

Ball flight/Distance: If you are looking for low ballflight, look elsewhere. Despite the strong lofts I hit these irons fairly high which is kind of what I expected to do with the added offset on the heads compared to my gamers. Now my gamers are shafted with KBS C-Tapers and I noticed probably about ½ club distance gain over my older S400 shafted irons. These RBZ’s are right there distance wise with my gamers, so I can safely say they are ½ club longer then irons I had been using last year. As Taylormade says “Our longer is longer” might be a little something to that. ( Ballflight with my DGS400 shafted 4I really improved, lower and penetrating vs the original shaft. Distance was still very comparable to my gamers which is good. With the Steelfiber in the 7iron, ballflight was only slightly higher then my gamer 7I with C-taper and distance was equal. I was hitting into a 15mph headwind and there was no sign of ballooning. )

Click here to see more photos and read the discussion in the forums

Honestly for a cast game improvement iron these are really not that bad, specifically speaking about the 6-AW wedge. Maybe there is something to this Taylormade “sound system” where both and acoustic polymer and constrained layer improve the feel and sound of the irons. Now I have also played the R9 TP “B” prototypes which I have regarded as the best feeling cast heads around. Now they don’t quite feel that good, but they are not too far off either.

The long irons on the other hand do not feel as solid of the rest of the set. Knowing the design behind them, I figured they would feel a little different and they did. Not terrible but definitely a little less feedback on where I was striking the ball on the face. ( After trying the 4I with S400 my opinion of it improved a little, but it definitely still has a different feel and sound from the rest of the set . I almost want to say it’s like a mini fairway wood in sound and feel.)

Again I have to remind everyone reading this that I am a forged iron player, but if I was not I would definitely give these irons a whirl. I actually really enjoy playing the 6-AW and the AW has really grown on me and was a good to club for a variety of shots because of its playability. I tried these with a high end graphite shaft because honestly I am not getting any younger but still have a 6I swingspeed in the 90s when I need it. I have not talked about the shaft until now, because I feel they were not a great fit me and we be swapping a few with something I’m more used to and maybe my opinion will adjust some. However I didn’t want to make this about the shafts and I still feel the iron heads are exceptionally well designed.

As I stated earlier I think these RBZ’s are geared towards the mid to high handicapper that struggles with ball flight and distance and direction. If you fit into this category these RBZ’s are a must try. Taylor made currently has a promotion giving away the 5i, so sign up and give it a go.

Click here to see more photos and read the discussion in the forums

Here is a great tech video to explain the technology…

Your Reaction?
  • 31
  • LEGIT14
  • WOW3
  • LOL3
  • IDHT3
  • FLOP3
  • OB3
  • SHANK39

Previous articleHunter Mahan WITB 2012
Next articleI like my Pings naked... No paintfill S57 irons/Tour-S wedges
Rob is a golf junkie that has been involved with GolfWRX since its inception in 2005. From designing headcovers, to creating logos to authoring articles to social media management to sales and marketing, Rob has done it all. Born and bred in NJ. Favorite golfers: Phil, Freddie. Favorite club: Driver.


Not seeing your comment? Read our rules and regulations. Click "Report comment" to alert GolfWRX moderators to offensive or inappropriate comments.
  1. this aint helping me in making my mind as to weather i should buy these irons i recently bought the r1 tm 5 fairway wood and tm hybrids and what a difference they made to my game i currently have the callaway razr irons

    • Bought a used set of these rocketballz irons to go with my taylormade rocketballs driver and jetspeed wood. I was using old irons like 10 to 15 year old.I did not realize how much the tech of the clubs hass changed. I went from consistently shooting 85-90 on the 2 courses i play and the first time out with the new irona shot an 82… Very forgiving club with a solid feel. I noticed a hughe difference with irons 4 and 5 and how smooth they felt. Honestly if you are using junk old irons, give these a whirl. They feel great.

  2. I just bought a set of these about 6 weeks ago and I really like them.
    I’m 63 years old, have an 8.3 index, and my swingspeed is around 90.
    The lofts are strong but I find that the 23* five iron launches much
    higher than the 23* four iron in my previous set and I can actually get
    the 20* four iron airborn. The set I bought is the HP version so the four, five, and six irons do not look like hybrids. All in all I’m very happy with my purchase.

  3. These are the worst irons I have Ever played. I can’t stand when you can see the bottom of a club like on the 4 and 5 iron plus they said that it gives you more distance but I actually lost a couple of yards. In my opinion These are the biggest waste of money and if you need a game improvement iron get some Pings instead.

  4. Purchased these irons after owning a set of cobra irons. I really like the feel and distance from these irons. I must say at first it took some getting use to but once I got adjusted to them I must say they are the best set of irons I have hit and they are longer than any other iron I have hit. I will say the one con on these irons are, when trying to shape shots it’s a little work cause these irons generally hit it straight! Overall I’m very pleased with them.

  5. Why does every review start with…”I did not have time to warm up, it was freezing cold outside, I am so damn good I don’t play this type of club etc”??? How about just reviewing them on the basis of the merits these particular clubs bring to the table.

    These clubs are pretty long, offer very consistent distance, come standard with a great shaft and will offer benefits to a lot of players….enough said….

    • I know this is a bit dated but this is a pet peeve of mine. No offense to the reviewer and he was trying his best, but why not have these clubs reviewed by someone for whom they were designed. If this particular set of irons are GI and for someone I assume is in the mid to high range, then have someone at that level review them. In fact, have three, then at least I can see if they benefited their respective games. Having someone who plays forged clubs and blades review these clubs would be like me, reviewing forged clubs and blades when I don’t play them. Most of the golf magazines do the same thing.

  6. I am a 5 handicap and I bought a set of these clubs because of all the great reviews I read. I could not have been more disappointed. In fact I returned them to the place I purchased. I did not see any distance improvement, in fact on the wedge through 8 iron i actually experienced a reduction in distance. The claim that mis hits go further could not be farther from the truth by my experience. I was not real excited about the look of the club in the beginning but thought I could get use to it – no chance. Bottom line is that perhaps a high handicapper may see some improvement but the claims made seem to be a little out there.

  7. I received a free 5 iron from TM, and it is by far the longest five iron I’ve ever hit. It is 23 loft, but I hit it farther than my 18 hybrid. Had multiple people test it at the range, but although some questioned the look, some the sound, none questioned the distance. All said it was super long, and super easy to hit. Most compared it distance wise to their 18 to 20 hybrid/fairway metal. The long hitter of the group had multiple 225 yard attempts, with range balls, and a wind from our back. He also hit it further than my hot 18 hybrid multiple times.